From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] smc911x: introduce read/write ops
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:06:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346216778-14100-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346216778-14100-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
This will allow to replace them depending on the platform data.
So we can specify shift and reg io witdh (16bit/32bit)
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
---
drivers/net/smc911x.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
index 9c488c7..2583235 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smc911x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ struct smc911x_priv {
struct eth_device edev;
struct mii_device miidev;
void __iomem *base;
+
+ u32 (*reg_read)(struct smc911x_priv *priv, u32 reg);
+ void (*reg_write)(struct smc911x_priv *priv, u32 reg, u32 val);
};
struct chip_id {
@@ -68,12 +71,34 @@ static const struct chip_id chip_ids[] = {
#define DRIVERNAME "smc911x"
+static inline u32 smc911x_reg_read(struct smc911x_priv *priv, u32 reg)
+{
+ return priv->reg_read(priv, reg);
+}
+
+static inline u32 __smc911x_reg_read(struct smc911x_priv *priv, u32 reg)
+{
+ return readl(priv->base + reg);
+}
+
+static inline void smc911x_reg_write(struct smc911x_priv *priv, u32 reg,
+ u32 val)
+{
+ priv->reg_write(priv, reg, val);
+}
+
+static inline void __smc911x_reg_write(struct smc911x_priv *priv, u32 reg,
+ u32 val)
+{
+ writel(val, priv->base + reg);
+}
+
static int smc911x_mac_wait_busy(struct smc911x_priv *priv)
{
uint64_t start = get_time_ns();
while (!is_timeout(start, MSECOND)) {
- if (!(readl(priv->base + MAC_CSR_CMD) & MAC_CSR_CMD_CSR_BUSY))
+ if (!(smc911x_reg_read(priv, MAC_CSR_CMD) & MAC_CSR_CMD_CSR_BUSY))
return 0;
}
@@ -88,12 +113,12 @@ static u32 smc911x_get_mac_csr(struct eth_device *edev, u8 reg)
smc911x_mac_wait_busy(priv);
- writel(MAC_CSR_CMD_CSR_BUSY | MAC_CSR_CMD_R_NOT_W | reg,
- priv->base + MAC_CSR_CMD);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, MAC_CSR_CMD, MAC_CSR_CMD_CSR_BUSY |
+ MAC_CSR_CMD_R_NOT_W | reg);
smc911x_mac_wait_busy(priv);
- val = readl(priv->base + MAC_CSR_DATA);
+ val = smc911x_reg_read(priv, MAC_CSR_DATA);
return val;
}
@@ -104,8 +129,8 @@ static void smc911x_set_mac_csr(struct eth_device *edev, u8 reg, u32 data)
smc911x_mac_wait_busy(priv);
- writel(data, priv->base + MAC_CSR_DATA);
- writel(MAC_CSR_CMD_CSR_BUSY | reg, priv->base + MAC_CSR_CMD);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, MAC_CSR_DATA, data);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, MAC_CSR_CMD, MAC_CSR_CMD_CSR_BUSY | reg);
smc911x_mac_wait_busy(priv);
}
@@ -179,10 +204,10 @@ static int smc911x_phy_reset(struct eth_device *edev)
struct smc911x_priv *priv = edev->priv;
u32 reg;
- reg = readl(priv->base + PMT_CTRL);
+ reg = smc911x_reg_read(priv, PMT_CTRL);
reg &= 0xfcf;
reg |= PMT_CTRL_PHY_RST;
- writel(reg, priv->base + PMT_CTRL);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, PMT_CTRL, reg);
mdelay(100);
@@ -195,13 +220,13 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct eth_device *edev)
uint64_t start;
/* Take out of PM setting first */
- if (readl(priv->base + PMT_CTRL) & PMT_CTRL_READY) {
+ if (smc911x_reg_read(priv, PMT_CTRL) & PMT_CTRL_READY) {
/* Write to the bytetest will take out of powerdown */
- writel(0, priv->base + BYTE_TEST);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, BYTE_TEST, 0);
start = get_time_ns();
while(1) {
- if ((readl(priv->base + PMT_CTRL) & PMT_CTRL_READY))
+ if ((smc911x_reg_read(priv, PMT_CTRL) & PMT_CTRL_READY))
break;
if (is_timeout(start, 100 * USECOND)) {
dev_err(&edev->dev,
@@ -212,13 +237,13 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct eth_device *edev)
}
/* Disable interrupts */
- writel(0, priv->base + INT_EN);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, INT_EN, 0);
- writel(HW_CFG_SRST, priv->base + HW_CFG);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, HW_CFG, HW_CFG_SRST);
start = get_time_ns();
while(1) {
- if (!(readl(priv->base + E2P_CMD) & E2P_CMD_EPC_BUSY))
+ if (!(smc911x_reg_read(priv, E2P_CMD) & E2P_CMD_EPC_BUSY))
break;
if (is_timeout(start, 10 * MSECOND)) {
dev_err(&edev->dev, "reset timeout\n");
@@ -229,10 +254,10 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct eth_device *edev)
/* Reset the FIFO level and flow control settings */
smc911x_set_mac_csr(edev, FLOW, FLOW_FCPT | FLOW_FCEN);
- writel(0x0050287F, priv->base + AFC_CFG);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, AFC_CFG, 0x0050287F);
/* Set to LED outputs */
- writel(0x70070000, priv->base + GPIO_CFG);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, GPIO_CFG, 0x70070000);
}
static void smc911x_enable(struct eth_device *edev)
@@ -240,14 +265,14 @@ static void smc911x_enable(struct eth_device *edev)
struct smc911x_priv *priv = edev->priv;
/* Enable TX */
- writel(8 << 16 | HW_CFG_SF, priv->base + HW_CFG);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, HW_CFG, 8 << 16 | HW_CFG_SF);
- writel(GPT_CFG_TIMER_EN | 10000, priv->base + GPT_CFG);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, GPT_CFG, GPT_CFG_TIMER_EN | 10000);
- writel(TX_CFG_TX_ON, priv->base + TX_CFG);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, TX_CFG, TX_CFG_TX_ON);
/* no padding to start of packets */
- writel(RX_CFG_RX_DUMP, priv->base + RX_CFG);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, RX_CFG, RX_CFG_RX_DUMP);
}
static int smc911x_eth_open(struct eth_device *edev)
@@ -270,19 +295,19 @@ static int smc911x_eth_send(struct eth_device *edev, void *packet, int length)
u32 status;
uint64_t start;
- writel(TX_CMD_A_INT_FIRST_SEG | TX_CMD_A_INT_LAST_SEG | length,
- priv->base + TX_DATA_FIFO);
- writel(length, priv->base + TX_DATA_FIFO);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, TX_DATA_FIFO,
+ TX_CMD_A_INT_FIRST_SEG | TX_CMD_A_INT_LAST_SEG | length);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, TX_DATA_FIFO, length);
tmplen = (length + 3) / 4;
while(tmplen--)
- writel(*data++, priv->base + TX_DATA_FIFO);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, TX_DATA_FIFO, *data++);
/* wait for transmission */
start = get_time_ns();
while (1) {
- if ((readl(priv->base + TX_FIFO_INF) &
+ if ((smc911x_reg_read(priv, TX_FIFO_INF) &
TX_FIFO_INF_TSUSED) >> 16)
break;
if (is_timeout(start, 100 * MSECOND)) {
@@ -294,7 +319,7 @@ static int smc911x_eth_send(struct eth_device *edev, void *packet, int length)
/* get status. Ignore 'no carrier' error, it has no meaning for
* full duplex operation
*/
- status = readl(priv->base + TX_STATUS_FIFO) & (TX_STS_LOC |
+ status = smc911x_reg_read(priv, TX_STATUS_FIFO) & (TX_STS_LOC |
TX_STS_LATE_COLL | TX_STS_MANY_COLL | TX_STS_MANY_DEFER |
TX_STS_UNDERRUN);
@@ -316,7 +341,7 @@ static void smc911x_eth_halt(struct eth_device *edev)
struct smc911x_priv *priv = (struct smc911x_priv *)edev->priv;
/* Disable TX */
- writel(TX_CFG_STOP_TX, priv->base + TX_CFG);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, TX_CFG, TX_CFG_STOP_TX);
// smc911x_reset(edev);
}
@@ -328,15 +353,15 @@ static int smc911x_eth_rx(struct eth_device *edev)
u32 pktlen, tmplen;
u32 status;
- if((readl(priv->base + RX_FIFO_INF) & RX_FIFO_INF_RXSUSED) >> 16) {
- status = readl(priv->base + RX_STATUS_FIFO);
+ if((smc911x_reg_read(priv, RX_FIFO_INF) & RX_FIFO_INF_RXSUSED) >> 16) {
+ status = smc911x_reg_read(priv, RX_STATUS_FIFO);
pktlen = (status & RX_STS_PKT_LEN) >> 16;
- writel(0, priv->base + RX_CFG);
+ smc911x_reg_write(priv, RX_CFG, 0);
tmplen = (pktlen + 2 + 3) / 4;
while(tmplen--)
- *data++ = readl(priv->base + RX_DATA_FIFO);
+ *data++ = smc911x_reg_read(priv, RX_DATA_FIFO);
if(status & RX_STS_ES)
dev_err(&edev->dev, "dropped bad packet. Status: 0x%08x\n",
@@ -366,18 +391,20 @@ static int smc911x_probe(struct device_d *dev)
struct smc911x_priv *priv;
uint32_t val;
int i;
- void __iomem *base;
- base = dev_request_mem_region(dev, 0);
+ priv = xzalloc(sizeof(*priv));
+ priv->base = dev_request_mem_region(dev, 0);
+ priv->reg_read = __smc911x_reg_read;
+ priv->reg_write = __smc911x_reg_write;
- val = readl(base + BYTE_TEST);
+ val = smc911x_reg_read(priv, BYTE_TEST);
if(val != 0x87654321) {
dev_err(dev, "no smc911x found on 0x%p (byte_test=0x%08x)\n",
- base, val);
+ priv->base, val);
return -ENODEV;
}
- val = readl(base + ID_REV) >> 16;
+ val = smc911x_reg_read(priv, ID_REV) >> 16;
for(i = 0; chip_ids[i].id != 0; i++) {
if (chip_ids[i].id == val) break;
}
@@ -388,7 +415,6 @@ static int smc911x_probe(struct device_d *dev)
dev_info(dev, "detected %s controller\n", chip_ids[i].name);
- priv = xzalloc(sizeof(*priv));
edev = &priv->edev;
edev->priv = priv;
@@ -407,7 +433,6 @@ static int smc911x_probe(struct device_d *dev)
priv->miidev.flags = 0;
priv->miidev.edev = edev;
priv->miidev.parent = dev;
- priv->base = base;
smc911x_reset(edev);
smc911x_phy_reset(edev);
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-29 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-29 4:27 [PATCH 0/7 2] smsc911x: runtime configuration improvement Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-29 5:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] smc911x: move register define to smc911x.h Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-29 5:06 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2012-08-29 5:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] smc911x: add 16bit bus width support Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-29 5:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] smc911x: add support to pass the shift via platform data Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-29 5:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] smc911x: improve detection handle Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-29 6:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-29 8:36 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-29 9:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-29 5:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] smc911x: update chip detection Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-29 5:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] smm911x: check if the device is ready before using it Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-29 6:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-29 8:35 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-29 9:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-29 10:07 ` Christian Hemp
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-01 8:47 [PATCH 0/7 v3] smsc911x: runtime configuration improvement Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-01 8:52 ` [PATCH 1/7] smc911x: move register define to smc911x.h Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-01 8:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] smc911x: introduce read/write ops Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-14 17:25 [PATCH 0/7] smsc911x: runtime configuration improvement Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-14 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/7] smc911x: move register define to smc911x.h Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-08-14 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] smc911x: introduce read/write ops Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1346216778-14100-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox