From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YdauR-0006fS-Qg for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 08:55:33 +0000 Message-ID: <1427964906.24886.14.camel@pengutronix.de> From: Lucas Stach Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:55:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150402083522.GE8125@ns203013.ovh.net> References: <1427841205-9393-1-git-send-email-mkl@pengutronix.de> <20150402083522.GE8125@ns203013.ovh.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] makfiles: add emacs syntax highlighting hint To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: mol@pengutronix.de, barebox@lists.infradead.org, sha@pengutronix.de Am Donnerstag, den 02.04.2015, 10:35 +0200 schrieb Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: > On 00:33 Wed 01 Apr , Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > This patches makes a standard emacs to recognise the files as makefiles. > not a fan of vi or emacs stuff in file > > btw I plan to drop the images/ and move them back to the ARCH > I'm not sure if this is time spent well. Moving the generated images _again_ will get you into some serious discussions with the people integrating barebox into BSP builds. We finally settled for a single directory going forward and changing this is not a good idea. Or did you mean just moving the rules out of images/, but keeping the generated binaries there? This might in fact be doable. Regards, Lucas -- Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox