From: Juergen Borleis <jbe@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: add some info about the reset variants
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:02:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434456145-21912-3-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434456145-21912-1-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Borleis <jbe@pengutronix.de>
---
Documentation/user/system-reset.rst | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/user/user-manual.rst | 1 +
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/user/system-reset.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/user/system-reset.rst b/Documentation/user/system-reset.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c2ee409
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/user/system-reset.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+.. _system_reset:
+
+System Reset
+------------
+
+When running the reset command barebox restarts the SoC somehow. Reset can
+be done in software, but a more reliable way is to use a hard reset line, which
+really resets the SoC.
+The most common way to force such a hard reset is by using a watchdog. Its
+trigger time will be setup as short as possible and after that the software just
+waits for its reset. Very simple and most of the time it does what's expected.
+
+But there are some drawbacks within this simple approach.
+
+* most used watchdogs are built-in units in the SoCs. There is nothing wrong
+ with that, but these units can mostly reset the CPU core and sometimes a little
+ bit more of the SoC. This means this reset is not exactly the same than the
+ real POR (e.g. power on reset). In this case you must still handle different
+ hardware in a special way because it hasn't seen the reset the CPU has seen.
+ Enabled DMA units for example can continue to run and transfer data while the
+ CPU core runs through its reset code. This can trigger very strange failures.
+
+* when interacting with flash memories (mostly NOR types and used to store the
+ root filesystem) it cannot provide data (sometimes called 'array mode') the
+ CPU wants to read after a reset while it is still in some programming mode.
+ And if the software is currently changing some data inside the flash and
+ an internal reset happens the CPU and the flash memory are doing different
+ things and the system hangs until a real POR which also resets the flash
+ memory into the 'array mode'.
+
+* some SoC's boot behaviour gets parametrized by so called 'bootstrap pins'.
+ These pins can have a different meaning at reset time and at run-time later
+ on (multi purpose pins) but their correct values at reset time are very
+ important to boot the SoC sucessfully. If external devices are connected to
+ these multi purpose pins they can disturb the reset values, and so parametrizing
+ the boot behaviour differently and hence crashing the SoC until the next real
+ POR happens which also resets the external devices (and keep them away from the
+ multi purpose pins).
+
+* when power management comes into play another level of failure is
+ possible. To save power the software can lower the clock(s), but to really
+ save power, the power supply voltages must be lowered as well. Most PMICs
+ (e.g. power management controllers) are dedicated external companion devices,
+ loosely connected to their SoC. If the SoC's internal reset source now resets
+ the CPU it may increases its clock(s) back to the frequencies after a POR, but
+ the external PMIC still provides voltages related to lower frequencies. The
+ system isn't consistent any more. If you are in luck, the SoC still works
+ somehow, even if the voltages are out of their specifications for the
+ currently used clock speeds. But don't rely on it.
+
+To workaround these issues the reset signal triggered by a SoC internal source
+must be 'visible' to the external devices to also reset them like a real POR do.
+But many SoCs do not provide such a signal. So you can't use the internal reset
+source if you face one of the above listed issues!
+
+A different solution is to use the PMIC (if available) to trigger the reset.
+Many PMICs provide their own watchdog units and if they trigger a reset they
+also switch their voltages back to the real POR values. This will be a system
+wide reset, like the POR is.
+
+Drawback of the PMIC solution is, you can't use the SoC's internal mechanisms to
+detect the :ref:`reset_reason` anymore. From the SoC point of view it is always
+a POR when the PMIC handles the system reset. If you are in luck the PMIC
+instead can provide this information if you depend on it.
diff --git a/Documentation/user/user-manual.rst b/Documentation/user/user-manual.rst
index 1fc6883..0d6daee 100644
--- a/Documentation/user/user-manual.rst
+++ b/Documentation/user/user-manual.rst
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ Contents:
booting-linux
system-setup
reset-reason
+ system-reset
* :ref:`search`
* :ref:`genindex`
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 12:02 [PATCH] Add some doc Juergen Borleis
2015-06-16 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: add some info about the reset reason framework Juergen Borleis
2015-06-16 12:02 ` Juergen Borleis [this message]
2015-06-17 6:19 ` [PATCH] Add some doc Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434456145-21912-3-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de \
--to=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox