mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@kymetacorp.com>
To: Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia <guille.rodriguez@gmail.com>
Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <pza@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Micrel KSZ9031RN PHY problem
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:18:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461953980.9103.189.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABDcavYOujwe8iQt4m8VQQcajkBiEWpw+Vj=6ghqtp=q09oXGw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 13:00 +0200, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> 2016-04-28 23:09 GMT+02:00 Trent Piepho <tpiepho@kymetacorp.com>:
> >
> > The first anreg start call will also un-powerdown the PHY if BMCR_PDOWN
> > was set.  I wonder if that is happening?
> 
> That was a very good hint and it looks like this is exactly what is happening.
> 
> genphy_restart_aneg() clears the BMCR_PDOWN bit and would get the phy
> out of powerdown mode. I have added a trace right at the beginning of
> genphy_restart_aneg and verified that BMCR_PDOWN bit was set before
> genphy_restart_aneg clears it.
> 
> Then, the datasheet for the ksz9031 [1], page 44, says:
> 
> After this bit is changed from '1' to '0', an internal global reset is
> automatically generated. Wait a minimum of 1ms before read/write
> access to the PHY registers.

Mystery solved!


> So this seems to be what is causing the problem. At least on the
> ksz9031 (don't know about others), a delay of 1ms is required when
> coming out of powerdown mode.

The kernel will take the phy in/out of powerdown mode as part of the PM
suspend/resume calls, which is supported on all micrel phys since 2013.
I don't see a delay in the kernel code and wonder why this hasn't been a
problem?  Might be worth asking on net-dev if this is a known issue with
some phys and how it is solved?  Maybe it's an undiscovered cause of
network flakiness after a resume.


> What is the best way to fix this? We can add a 1ms delay in
> genphy_restart_aneg (this is probably the easiest, and the delay is
> small enough that it shouldn't make a difference for other phys that
> might not need it). Or if this is not acceptable, perhaps add a custom
> restart_aneg function for the ksz9031.

Could add a custom init function that un-powerdowns the phy and does the
wait.

Or have restart_aneg check if the powerdown bit was set before it clears
it, and only delay in that case.

Having the un-powerdown in the restart_aneg isn't really the right place
for it.  If there is no reason the restart aneg, then the phy will not
be powered up.

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-29 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CABDcavZr1PCpFrHVJFFayRQZ6vninf-xFS0H9QKSdA8u53OkDg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-04-18 14:49 ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-04-19  7:11   ` Sascha Hauer
2016-04-20 15:58     ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-04-21  7:32       ` Sascha Hauer
2016-04-21 11:04         ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-04-26  9:55         ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-04-26 11:10           ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-04-27  5:59           ` Sascha Hauer
2016-04-28  9:51             ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-04-28 21:09               ` Trent Piepho
2016-04-29 11:00                 ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-04-29 18:18                   ` Trent Piepho [this message]
2016-05-03 14:40                     ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-05-04  7:43                       ` Sascha Hauer
2016-05-04 10:39                         ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-06-13 17:29                         ` [PATCH] Fix genphy_restart_aneg() for Micrel's ksz9031 Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-06-14  6:39                           ` Sascha Hauer
2016-06-14  7:39                             ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
2016-06-15  5:49                               ` Sascha Hauer
2016-06-15  7:44                                 ` Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1461953980.9103.189.camel@rtred1test09.kymeta.local \
    --to=tpiepho@kymetacorp.com \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=guille.rodriguez@gmail.com \
    --cc=pza@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox