From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:38:08 +0100 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tVXCC-000m7f-1D for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:38:08 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tVXCC-0001dd-B9 for lore@pengutronix.de; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:38:08 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To: From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=gig+DaXDwV2G8p77XQmcAF9XN+NuyDmV8q+/KJ/qlCg=; b=reCtCp+7d7iz1/Nve2bQhpD6ZY P+fmZnzHPCcDkQA8uThcvD8fUu3PaeTS8lMpmReDGvssZ0mN6mQVp4esjWNt5POcy6FalV45B1Y3d LSj6LPktUpfU0aEoeE2lNeT12zvJfgivucWRZLbsBZtXWt/Wj7rKOnhLrl/RJVkbtp7XTWLzBUmtL mbYur4wzZR9agy5A8GqczM9dw7CawwRTzuhHTnW55sJWNokrtxzhexxGD/L+H9vPh8tygCUXoSdh1 c6+3Wnh9Y4fgRdLcrR2XAFy+pShXB8OKhp4LFeVmMbmzQ3DhI1EFju7sTJXnDcenx87OeDD7EVRhI Nc7274Hw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tVXBk-00000008oiU-2P6S; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 14:37:40 +0000 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tVX9d-00000008oKn-1vzB for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 14:35:30 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tVX9c-0000y0-Ai; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:35:28 +0100 Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tVX9b-007XQ0-1C; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:35:28 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tVX9c-000JfP-0G; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:35:28 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Oleksij Rempel In-Reply-To: <20250107113047.1231520-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> References: <20250107113047.1231520-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Message-Id: <173634692807.75578.13877180792560407201.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:35:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250108_063529_501218_DA070D73 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.58 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] nvmem: bsec: Fix incorrect size calculation for PTA read X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 12:30:47 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Correct the size parameter in stm32_bsec_pta_read() to use sizeof(*val) > instead of sizeof(val). The previous implementation incorrectly > calculated the size of the pointer instead of the pointed-to value, > potentially causing incorrect behavior during the read operation. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] nvmem: bsec: Fix incorrect size calculation for PTA read https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=06e9050f42fd (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer