From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:21:07 +0100 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tlS1j-0056pN-1z for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:21:07 +0100 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tlS1i-0000Pw-Ew for lore@pengutronix.de; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:21:06 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc: To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=yfOhLIRVEomKBORHCiRK+x3lZGuyV4Xjqe8eYjGsrh8=; b=WVPQlpfRFrGf4PP2K8N7NFLIXV DFV6ctS9SDgyD9DEf7KvFFKwumHvlGOqv4LJQd31ATth4KCYtr9mD6Y5GqNkEFnTg7HhwbgQEcsNa fIz+SiDZEFnDRxGudfKEzm9U5S/MD5tefX6SOdPK0U1q/JQ8BCx8kt2fIt/r3qDCWE+FJBBPhPHjQ zJjz46pRblHSPEBjOk5irZ1xb/+KOtKzAEeKPcdMzDqrFHjaW+Gxy5ui8tb+jPkrWfxsTUeTHibad dSq12rL2PMPYNGaBkzo57z1lN5QwnjNr/LBziYZrspfgvsp0Y/tHGhGV9+jhKBZIQ1/xJs8maSXCE +SNuWYsA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tlS1G-00000005SXt-3OIL; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:20:38 +0000 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tlS1D-00000005SWj-2rTv for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:20:36 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tlS1C-0000I4-8F; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:20:34 +0100 Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tlS1B-0026Gs-35; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:20:33 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tlS1B-006CnS-2s; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:20:33 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum Cc: Richard Weinberger In-Reply-To: <20250220203032.3350247-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> References: <20250220203032.3350247-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Message-Id: <174014043388.1478951.219003102869539280.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:20:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250221_042035_723403_8334348E X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.75 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:7c80:54:3::133 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] malloc: define a maximum malloc size X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:30:27 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > TLSF and dlmalloc each already enforce a maximum allocation size. > > Let's define SZ_1G as common maximum allocation size in preparation > for aligning all allocators to observe it. > > The intention is to make code easier to reason about and as extra > hardening against possible, yet undiscovered, allocator bugs. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/6] malloc: define a maximum malloc size https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=6279bd2d3a33 (link may not be stable) [2/6] tlsf: fail allocations exceeding MALLOC_MAX_SIZE https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=b5c4d87dfb62 (link may not be stable) [3/6] dlmalloc: fail allocations exceeding MALLOC_MAX_SIZE https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=122a8979fefb (link may not be stable) [4/6] sandbox: libc_malloc: fail allocations exceeding MALLOC_MAX_SIZE https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=8839004152f7 (link may not be stable) [5/6] dummy_malloc: fail allocations exceeding MALLOC_MAX_SIZE https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=8dcd7add5943 (link may not be stable) [6/6] test: self: malloc: adapt to addition of MALLOC_MAX_SIZE https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=cb77a6989e59 (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer