From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Rouven Czerwinski <rouven.czerwinski@linaro.org>,
lst@pengutronix.de, fpg@pengutronix.de,
Fabian Pflug <f.pflug@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: optee-early: drop superfluous sync_caches_for_execution
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:10:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174962581968.587796.13197234743095302462.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610201320.2691564-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 22:13:18 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> We expect start_optee_early() to be called with caches disabled, so there
> is no point in calling sync_caches_for_execution inside.
>
> Therefore let's verify the assumption that caches are indeed disabled
> and drop the useless call.
>
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] ARM: optee-early: drop superfluous sync_caches_for_execution
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=02f4e6b02730 (link may not be stable)
[2/3] ARM: Cortex-A9: invalidate caches in early lowlevel init
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=2754c3aba9d1 (link may not be stable)
[3/3] ARM: i.MX6Q: drop duplicate arm_early_mmu_cache_invalidate
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=6db7f695218f (link may not be stable)
Best regards,
--
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 20:13 Ahmad Fatoum
2025-06-10 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: Cortex-A9: invalidate caches in early lowlevel init Ahmad Fatoum
2025-06-10 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: i.MX6Q: drop duplicate arm_early_mmu_cache_invalidate Ahmad Fatoum
2025-06-11 7:10 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174962581968.587796.13197234743095302462.b4-ty@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=f.pflug@pengutronix.de \
--cc=fpg@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lst@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rouven.czerwinski@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox