From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:53:29 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wgzgP-00185A-2j for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:53:29 +0200 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4950201CD7 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:53:29 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=YBA3Tafp; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org"; dmarc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To: From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=bZl8J9Zh/4RvOIe1laybC/3S9rvQDeCzE9ILcR5L8H4=; b=YBA3TafpWEvD3idiPGgiEQ2m7s 3e0+/sxPNpws3px/Q/om5t5Ha1YSHM2ty9trqzYU/uoUrFuFbTXS8a0sTg3nWiYH2FOs4YPH8rgqs YFsRh2i2YXgm5gs0ufWxajbS+H+m1Ot8ey5lxAAdo/6ZkA2UvY18W06btSz3GuWwWj03fWCoMRMWf KD+dwQ1r708sqL7t9KlqWlTdVEHDcJRcHvCW9n9Cr9o7dTdissAsOShw/YqZNqHjuqYbzpeD7w52p LvErmesJbXI/pL1uHbCmlls59GfkTpLDIDIhdmwZE6K7OunBmyqHJbWMZNh9JHyLT0tr+V7dKBS4g c7HTWsaQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wgzfO-0000000EG0i-3xKP; Tue, 07 Jul 2026 06:52:26 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wgzfL-0000000EFyz-38VY for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2026 06:52:25 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de (drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) (Authenticated sender: relay-from-drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0094A201CD7; Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wgzfJ-000Wuf-2v; Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:52:21 +0200 Received: from [::1] (helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wgzfJ-0000000ETDF-3Uld; Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:52:21 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum In-Reply-To: <20260702103851.2391715-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> References: <20260702103851.2391715-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] optee: device: report correct command in enumeration error message Message-Id: <178340714182.3448233.16608084536594491315.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:52:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260706_235223_948074_1E5A53D1 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.06 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, 02 Jul 2026 12:38:51 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > While enumeration failure always mentions "PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES", it is > possible that either PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES_SUPP or PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.71 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.40)[2607:7c80:54:3::133:from,2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28:received]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2:received]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A4950201CD7 X-Stat-Signature: ohguxwbwrwre4a33n38383rz1eu343oq On Thu, 02 Jul 2026 12:38:51 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > While enumeration failure always mentions "PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES", it is > possible that either PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES_SUPP or PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES_RPMB > were the culprits. > > Remove the hardcoded PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES in the error message as it's no > longer accurate and replace it by the actual command being sent. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] optee: device: report correct command in enumeration error message https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=7f383894cb68 (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer