From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:05:37 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x51sn-000y60-2G for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:05:37 +0200 Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=wmD4Dqly; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org"; dmarc=none Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D1E205A1B for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:05:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To: From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=USzd+2ybZONGUzrTbFftRshEAIs6+3iHEZaOCv5W6+4=; b=wmD4Dqlyg2K5wr9BzY5lziom2k VqYqrTJml2f+MgAskUIiZxGnNJJgIRazc3MFsZFDfeRQRWzgS/tATWBxaITE6A5JEV6feLEG+3SbL oZiG5/FTQV7reE7YYhlu/wFdHHw0/G2ByCQQY8CSohJiJ35atxmCjTEAX0uzIhAzSqeb0Hjrw9AO/ gmg2HhuRiIQ9Hh1WdTiJ4TRBA9NkHBlawUtGWeB5MicaaDPHalESL14CuE+HeQ0YUWxWDqgD5yu9s KIW4G61y4Hpd+O6FuihfJ87l853GFpz++xsK1TOGoY5q/86KX84m6UqZ2F03frAokSbi69l9XZCG8 W43BWFSg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x51re-0000000GqgI-1NFc; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:04:26 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x51ra-0000000Gqfs-1G2h for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:04:24 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de (drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) (Authenticated sender: relay-from-drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 675DC20268F; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:04:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x51rY-000Qf0-15; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:04:20 +0200 Received: from [::1] (helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x51rY-0000000A9hQ-18CR; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:04:20 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: BAREBOX , Sascha Hauer In-Reply-To: <20260908-fs-filesize-fixes-v1-0-8cf3e781a4d0@pengutronix.de> References: <20260908-fs-filesize-fixes-v1-0-8cf3e781a4d0@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs: reject inodes whose size the superblock cannot address Message-Id: <178913546026.2420551.13685534641272061556.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:04:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260911_070422_494308_FAFFCD4F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.17 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:32:08 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > This is a continuation of the patch previously sent as a single patch. > > Additionally I added a patch cleaning up the FILE_SIZE_STREAM disa [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Stat-Signature: wmnos416xpr7yq1majxs7ao6t6cnz8x1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 87D1E205A1B X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-57.81 / 15.00]; RECEIVED_AUTHENTICATED_BY_MX1(-50.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; KNOWN_LIST_ID(-1.00)[barebox.lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.60)[2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2:received,2607:7c80:54:3::133:from,2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28:received]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-0.999]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action On Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:32:08 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > This is a continuation of the patch previously sent as a single patch. > > Additionally I added a patch cleaning up the FILE_SIZE_STREAM disambiguity. > The problem is that we overloaded the inode size with a flag indicating > that the inode belongs to a stream with undefined file size. The new > patch solves this by adding extra flags to struct inode. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/2] fs: track streaming and unknown-size files in dedicated inode fields https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=260a4c6af4e3 (link may not be stable) [2/2] fs: reject inodes whose size the superblock cannot address https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=b37ad309e6ca (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer