From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:08:26 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x51vW-000y87-2a for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:08:26 +0200 Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=ouOPkvn+; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org"; dmarc=none Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92F28205A26 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:08:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To: From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=66wlSbYj49fXpQPtaHE3ujLmtH5j4vsdn3LsyHO1Q2Q=; b=ouOPkvn+UNPwfKk/vRAufF6N0+ JDIpV3Wp3HW8IB7B6MJNusdKnG/UVnabr/yKHlYvD6lbcDwzfBIgHpySkCwgx1rjaaryZiRuNHVGl RYxMJoQuxIZwAwvRdaCLksgvSc4RBJtDzgEkwGdiVpcXdo+/RbKKm+fSf+wVN1BYCwbaGsUppzulT Y7QX3kQDLTdYSjBHlPAfBxZLtPRGpRwDiUpx8wN4y2BSV6SPIs9gxeZZVj3pzWF24hKpOkMNiUQ2w 5EyNoo0xd+G5oR+jeuOXVGTHj2SHdayUkat6CzsnOAa56bFdwbIE+KuHx0PNWc0fczBl19DP+nPvS kxS91dVw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x51uR-0000000GqvQ-3nV9; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:07:19 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:b01:1d::107]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x51uO-0000000Gqv2-3XXI for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:07:18 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de (drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) (Authenticated sender: relay-from-drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20422201CD1; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:07:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x51uN-000Qj5-04; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:07:15 +0200 Received: from [::1] (helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x51uM-0000000A9kl-3ylZ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:07:14 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum In-Reply-To: <20260909103827.3321304-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> References: <20260909103827.3321304-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: security: note FIT configuration choice being unsigned Message-Id: <178913563494.2420758.10207304593197289811.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:07:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260911_070717_034294_D5CD97AA X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.25 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:38:26 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > /configurations/default is not covered by any signature and is thus > trivially modifiable by an attacker. Point that out in the docs. > > Applied, thanks! Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Stat-Signature: rb1hjqi79c4xhqw1aojf1m37sc4ibc67 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 92F28205A26 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-57.66 / 15.00]; RECEIVED_AUTHENTICATED_BY_MX1(-50.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-2.85)[99.36%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; KNOWN_LIST_ID(-1.00)[barebox.lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.60)[2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2:received,2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28:received,2607:7c80:54:3::133:from]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action On Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:38:26 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > /configurations/default is not covered by any signature and is thus > trivially modifiable by an attacker. Point that out in the docs. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] Documentation: security: note FIT configuration choice being unsigned https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=94501858b2d7 (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer