From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:14:08 +0200 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by lore.white.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x5212-000yTh-1Z for lore@lore.pengutronix.de; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:14:08 +0200 Authentication-Results: mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=lists.infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=d2b3hfnV; spf=pass (mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de: domain of "barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org" designates 2607:7c80:54:3::133 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="barebox-bounces+lore=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org"; dmarc=none Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54B88205A1A for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:14:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-Id:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc: To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=u63QAysg6eFrX9Um04HWJZOSlVIzeajYmJYI5LC+5ZM=; b=d2b3hfnVGA+ahF2e8jb5qvz15d 0zpiBhO7vS7UZlKbOn2GVknk6i8Th/Jju+9q9NkzaUhQhW6fIdswRPpy7PaTilx7s+OSV8PYqN8qB sjyb7pcB7LqYcZJfAWZnG+v/58Tp4zfhE4ZARN3uePxkWiHFDxcgL3WtkWfePARTIRs+kSZQGMDqB 7vntfO5IYMKxJPcCjIQBgLkMa7I9oa4vfQJL34c0YeEPxLPuKhwM6bf4/+IxVEn50mtgkv8R/+hFt Il+mRdLQz24xm9US0hRMTOKjZJ128J8BqHXrJFL73jgULwA5RQXQponZIdshiOp6rUllmN5YfKteQ WgO1Kj5g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x51zv-0000000Gsmb-3Zr5; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:12:59 +0000 Received: from mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de ([185.203.200.13]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x51zq-0000000GskP-3Kg1 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:12:59 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de (drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) (Authenticated sender: relay-from-drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de) by mx1.white.stw.pengutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44F3B20268F; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:12:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28]) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x51zp-000QvU-0e; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:12:53 +0200 Received: from [::1] (helo=dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de) by dude02.red.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x51zp-0000000A9sk-0acs; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:12:53 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum Cc: Michael Tretter In-Reply-To: <20260904101345.399568-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> References: <20260904101345.399568-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH master] ARM64: clocksource: drop too early error message Message-Id: <178913597313.2421247.18396404631206193474.b4-ty@pengutronix.de> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:12:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260911_071256_026402_4BD97A4D X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.60 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, 04 Sep 2026 12:13:45 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > Constructors are executed directly after relocations were applied. > But only after applying relocations is it safe to run arbitrary C code. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DMARC_MISSING Missing DMARC policy X-BeenThere: barebox@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "barebox" X-Rspamd-Server: mx1 X-Stat-Signature: dirp1xzsseyi7is67tk1y1nq4zgd56g3 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 54B88205A1A X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-57.81 / 15.00]; RECEIVED_AUTHENTICATED_BY_MX1(-50.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[infradead.org:dkim]; KNOWN_LIST_ID(-1.00)[barebox.lists.infradead.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.60)[2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2:received,2607:7c80:54:3::133:from,2a0a:edc0:0:1101:1d::28:received]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lists.infradead.org:s=bombadil.20210309]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[lore=pengutronix.de]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pengutronix.de]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7247, ipnet:2607:7c80:54::/48, country:US]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[s.hauer@pengutronix.de,barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lists.infradead.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: no action On Fri, 04 Sep 2026 12:13:45 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > Constructors are executed directly after relocations were applied. > But only after applying relocations is it safe to run arbitrary C code. > > This causes an issue: If arm_arch_timer_init() fails and CONFIG_DEBUG_LL > is enabled, the hardcoded serial port will be used, which may hang the > system if serial setup has not happened yet. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] ARM64: clocksource: drop too early error message https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=8f03cf3da66f (link may not be stable) Best regards, -- Sascha Hauer