From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1O5E4t-0001KW-0D for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:17:36 +0000 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:17:32 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Message-ID: <20100423081732.GA17463@pengutronix.de> References: <1271665698-23163-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1271665698-23163-2-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20100422111001.GH7882@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100422111001.GH7882@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] give nice output when generating barebox.bin and barebox.S To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hey Sascha, On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:10:01PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:28:12AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > From: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig > > = > > As a side effect don't build barebox.S when barebox.bin is updated. I > > didn't manage to keep the old behaviour and I consider it cleaner this > > way. > = > I don't understand this completely. We only need barebox.S updated when > barebox is updated, not when barebox.bin is updated. Is this what you > mean? The status quo in your master branch is that barebox.S is created/updated in the barebox.bin target. After my patch it's a seperate target depending on barebox. Does this help? Uwe -- = Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox