From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1R8tiG-0001ww-PA for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:58:13 +0000 Received: from gallifrey.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:5054:ff:fe8d:eefb] helo=localhost) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R8tiE-0007cj-S6 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:58:10 +0200 From: Juergen Beisert Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:58:08 +0200 References: <201109281216.14413.jbe@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <201109281216.14413.jbe@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201109281458.09005.jbe@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Anybody working on Samsung S3C64xx support To: barebox@lists.infradead.org Myself wrote: > is anybody working on Barebox support for the ARM11 based S3C6410 CPU from > Samsung (just to be sure to not re-invent the wheel)? When adding the S3C6410 CPU support: Should I try to extend the existing S3C24xx family (its uses an ARMv4 core) with the ARMv6 core S3C64xx family, or better a separate mach-* directory? Both CPUs sharing some peripherals, but with many little differences (known from i.MX...) Regards, Juergen -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5128 | Vertretung Sued/Muenchen, Germany | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox