From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>
Cc: gta04-owner@goldelico.com, barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: barebox on gta04
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:36:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111025083647.GS23421@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111025063850.GA19390@hoothoot>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:38:50AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:34:13PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > You could start barebox from U-Boot (just load the barebox binary
> > image to RAM and jump to it using the U-Boot 'go' command). Then you
> > could comment out the lowlevel code from barebox (arch_init_lowlevel,
> > pin_mux) and see if the problem persists. Maybe there is something
> > different in the lowlevel code.
>
> This is a great idea! So first I loaded the unmodified barebox binary
> using:
>
> mmc rescan 0
> fatload mmc 0 0x82000000 barebox.bin
> go 0x82000000
>
> It started executing and the error was the same as before.
>
> Then I tried doing what you suggested above and commented
> arch_init_lowlevel in ./arch/arm/mach-omap/omap3_core.S and I was not
> sure what you meant by `pin_mux` as the string appeared nowhere in the
> code but I thought you might mean the mux_config in
> ./arch/arm/boards/omap/board-beagle.c ?
Yes, that's what I meant
> But after doing that, barebox
> would just not start anymore when loaded by uboot.
Strange. Should not be the case, no idea what's happening here.
>
> So can you give me some more specific advices on what to comment?
>
> > Another thing: Where does this string come from? We have this twice in
> > the driver and one of them should really be "timeout waiting for reset
> > done"
>
> If I read the code correctly, then my error comes from line
> 224 of ./drivers/mci/omap_hsmmc.c :
>
> dev_dbg(hsmmc->dev, "timedout waiting for cc2!\n");
Look again, we accidently have the same string twice in the driver:
./drivers/mci/omap_hsmmc.c:201: dev_dbg(hsmmc->dev, "timedout waiting for cc2!\n");
./drivers/mci/omap_hsmmc.c:224: dev_dbg(hsmmc->dev, "timedout waiting for cc2!\n");
The one in line 224 should really be "timeout waiting for reset done".
So what I wanted to know is whether it's the error message in line 201
or 224 that we see. So please change one of them
>
> I activated this debug message by using "#define DEBUG" on top of the
> file. Initially I only got the message "Cannot reset the SD/MMC
> interface" from line 1185 in ./drivers/mci/mci-core.c after it tried to
> call the init code from omap_hsmmc.c.
>
> But where would you find "timeout waiting for reset done"? I tried to
> recursively grep my barebox sources without finding this string?
>
> thanks!
>
> cheers, josch
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-25 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-24 21:11 Johannes Schauer
2011-10-24 21:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-10-25 6:38 ` Johannes Schauer
2011-10-25 8:36 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2011-10-25 10:05 ` Johannes Schauer
2011-10-31 11:57 ` Robert Schwebel
2011-10-31 14:05 ` Johannes Schauer
2011-10-31 14:18 ` Robert Schwebel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-24 21:01 Johannes Schauer
2011-10-24 21:07 ` Robert Schwebel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111025083647.GS23421@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=gta04-owner@goldelico.com \
--cc=j.schauer@email.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox