From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RJY1b-0007JX-9l for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:02:12 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:02:06 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20111027220206.GB23421@pengutronix.de> References: <4EA7C424.2030901@televic.com> <20111026115234.GZ23421@pengutronix.de> <4EA9331D.9090004@selea.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EA9331D.9090004@selea.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: different NAND type. To: Omar Pighi Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Omar Pighi wrote: > Hi, > > on imx25 evaboard there is a samsung nand flash, now I'm using a micron > on our board (with different size), > is there any kind of dependence on redboot? something to change ? (the DCD?) > because it is not booting any moe with the new flash... > suggestion are welcome. First of all, please do not hijack topics, start a new thread for new topics. If your barebox image started on the old board the same image should start on a different flash aswell, at least when you got the bootstrap pins right (pagesize, bus width). Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox