From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 19.mo4.mail-out.ovh.net ([87.98.179.66] helo=mo4.mail-out.ovh.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RYt8r-0008ET-Tu for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 05:37:07 +0000 Received: from mail192.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo4.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CAF9D10502D6 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 06:37:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 06:33:08 +0100 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Message-ID: <20111209053308.GH23884@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1323262387-8012-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1323262387-8012-11-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20111208142036.GB23884@game.jcrosoft.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111208142036.GB23884@game.jcrosoft.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] arm at91sam9260: Add missing AT91SAM_ETX2_ETX3_ALTERNATIVE define To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On 15:20 Thu 08 Dec , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 13:53 Wed 07 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h > > index 546fe90..5e23688 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h > > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ void at91_add_device_nand(struct atmel_nand_data *data); > > #define AT91SAM_ETHER_MII (0 << 0) > > #define AT91SAM_ETHER_RMII (1 << 0) > > #define AT91SAM_ETHER_FORCE_LINK (1 << 1) > > +#define AT91SAM_ETX2_ETX3_ALTERNATIVE (2 << 0 > this will not work too > > (1 << 1) = (1 << 0) btw where does this come from I see no patch about it on the ML at All NACK Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox