IMX_IIM on which SoCs?

IMX_IIM on which SoCs?

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 476 bytes --]


I just stumbled over commit 97c37f4014b0e3bacf31fe5b6ba890cc7f465838 which
changes this:

-       depends on ARCH_IMX25 || ARCH_IMX35
+       depends on !ARCH_IMX21 && !ARCH_IMX21

The double !ARCH_IMX21 looks fishy. Can't tell if the second IMX21 should
have been something else.

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 149 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Re: IMX_IIM on which SoCs?

[Eric Bénard]

Hi Wolfram,

Le Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:17:10 +0200,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> a écrit :

> 
> I just stumbled over commit 97c37f4014b0e3bacf31fe5b6ba890cc7f465838 which
> changes this:
> 
> -       depends on ARCH_IMX25 || ARCH_IMX35
> +       depends on !ARCH_IMX21 && !ARCH_IMX21
> 
> The double !ARCH_IMX21 looks fishy. Can't tell if the second IMX21 should
> have been something else.
> 
excepting i.MX2&, the other IMX supported by barebox have IIM so the
second !ARCH_IMX21 can be removed here

Eric

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox