From: "Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Enable unaligned accesses on armv6 and later
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:43:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712114352.51e3de9b@eb-e6520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341817779-29531-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Hi Sascha,
Le Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:09:39 +0200,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> a écrit :
> We have the following in the tree:
>
> |commit af42feb9d255bc3ea3b514180f265479ea8834f9
> |Author: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
> |Date: Mon Jan 2 11:49:17 2012 +0100
> |
> | ARM: set SCTRL[A] only when architecture does not support unaligned access
> |
> | Recent gcc generates code with unaligned access when architecture
> | supports it. Setting A bit unconditionally causes data-aborts on such
> | code rendering barebox unusable.
> |
> | Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
> | Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
>
> What the patch tried is correct: We should set the A bit only when the architecture
> does not support unaligned accesses. To figure out whether the architecture supports
> unaligned accesses the patch tested for the U bit which is wrong. The U bit may be
> 0 after a reset, so instead of testing for the U bit we have to set it. This can
> be done on armv6 and later. All others have the A bit set to trap unaligned accesses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>
> Enrico, can you confirm this is correct?
>
> Thanks
> Sascha
>
> arch/arm/cpu/start.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/start.c b/arch/arm/cpu/start.c
> index 3c282ee..523179d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/start.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/start.c
> @@ -81,13 +81,11 @@ void __naked __bare_init reset(void)
> r &= ~(CR_M | CR_C | CR_B | CR_S | CR_R | CR_V);
> r |= CR_I;
>
> - if (!(r & CR_U))
> - /* catch unaligned access on architectures which do not
> - * support unaligned access */
> - r |= CR_A;
> - else
> - r &= ~CR_A;
> -
> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6
> + r |= CR_U;
> +#else
> + r |= CR_A;
> +#endif
>
> #ifdef __ARMEB__
> r |= CR_B;
Tested-by: Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>
this patch fix the crash we had in show_progress.
Eric
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-09 7:09 Sascha Hauer
2012-07-12 9:43 ` Eric Bénard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120712114352.51e3de9b@eb-e6520 \
--to=eric@eukrea.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox