From: "Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fec: restart autoneg at open instead of init
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:51:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120907095113.02bdc12e@eb-e6520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120907074734.GO26594@pengutronix.de>
Hi Sascha,
Le Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:47:34 +0200,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:30:00AM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> >
> > Le Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:57:03 +0200,
> > Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> a écrit :
> >
> > > Hi Eric,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:39:29PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > > > this saves some time during boot when ethernet is not needed in barebox
> > >
> > > Is this really significant on your hardware? I made a measurement here
> > > and the miidev_restart_aneg() takes 130us on an i.MX27 board.
> > >
> > > The original intention of doing it at init time was that autonegotation
> > > is already completed when we actually use the network. And this time
> > > really is significant:
> > >
> > > without the patch:
> > >
> > > barebox@Phytec phyCORE-i.MX27:/ time ping 192.168.23.4
> > > warning: No MAC address set. Using random address 62:FE:FE:0B:09:A8
> > > phy0: Link is up - 100/Full
> > > host 192.168.23.4 is alive
> > > time: 10ms
> > >
> > > with the patch:
> > >
> > > barebox@Phytec phyCORE-i.MX27:/ time ping 192.168.23.4
> > > warning: No MAC address set. Using random address A6:1B:AB:80:FA:E7
> > > phy0: Link is up - 100/Full
> > > host 192.168.23.4 is alive
> > > time: 2040ms
> > >
> > that strange. I don't see why miidev_restart_aneg() would take less
> > time at boot than at open.
>
> Well, it does not really take longer. The difference is that if you are
> sitting before your board it usually takes a few seconds to interrupt
> autoboot, think what you want to do, and finally enter some network
> command. In the meantime autonegotiation will be complete. If we start
> autonegotiation at open time, we will always have to wait for the full
> autonegotiation time after starting the first network command.
>
I didn't check but on my board, the problem may be similar to the 1G
wrong detection : if miidev_restart_aneg is trying to acess the phy
when the MII link is not yet initialized, then it would wait 1s for
the reset to timeout in miidev_restart_aneg which would explain why I
save 1s with this patch.
Eric
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-07 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 19:39 Eric Bénard
2012-09-06 19:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] i.MX51: unbreak FEC iomux Eric Bénard
2012-09-07 8:30 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-06 19:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] miidev: fix 1G wrong detection Eric Bénard
2012-09-06 21:52 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-07 6:44 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 7:28 ` Eric Bénard
2012-09-07 8:23 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 7:43 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-07 8:52 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2012-09-07 9:02 ` Eric Bénard
2012-09-07 9:28 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2012-09-07 9:32 ` Eric Bénard
2012-09-14 7:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 6:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] fec: restart autoneg at open instead of init Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 7:30 ` Eric Bénard
2012-09-07 7:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-07 7:51 ` Eric Bénard [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-06 19:38 Eric Bénard
2012-09-06 21:52 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-10 7:43 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-10 7:51 ` Eric Bénard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120907095113.02bdc12e@eb-e6520 \
--to=eric@eukrea.com \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox