From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org>
Received: from 13.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net ([87.98.182.191]
 helo=mo5.mail-out.ovh.net)
 by casper.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1TCRhY-0003YG-H9
 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 08:56:41 +0000
Received: from mail404.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59])
 by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AE790FFAC9A
 for <barebox@lists.infradead.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:58:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:50:01 +0200
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Message-ID: <20120914085001.GA25990@game.jcrosoft.org>
References: <CAJfOKByn43d80YRB52D2RQXVhvweAzQYv2MvRtVyh2-+q5XBQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120914071804.GR6180@pengutronix.de>
 <CAJfOKBwqwKGcTZ7X0Z9yLiD6EezXoZmjqfar3koM=d0pvRCCmQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120914072536.GS6180@pengutronix.de>
 <20120914074437.GE20834@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <CAJfOKByY9O8ARE3BAbMbmyeowRLcVBMSQv8hFey=cx7=bahHWg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJfOKByY9O8ARE3BAbMbmyeowRLcVBMSQv8hFey=cx7=bahHWg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <barebox.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/barebox>,
 <mailto:barebox-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/>
List-Post: <mailto:barebox@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:barebox-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox>,
 <mailto:barebox-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][FAT] Handle MBR on the first sector
To: Franck Jullien <franck.jullien@gmail.com>
Cc: barebox <barebox@lists.infradead.org>


On 10:47 Fri 14 Sep     , Franck Jullien wrote:
> 
> 2012/9/14 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>:
> >
> > On 09:25 Fri 14 Sep     , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:22:07AM +0200, Franck Jullien wrote:
> >> > 2012/9/14 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>:
> >> > > Hi Franck,
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:13:29PM +0200, Franck Jullien wrote:
> >> > >> *** Did not send this email with git because it's no working where I am **
> >> > >>
> >> > >> We may have some disk with MBR as a first sector. In this case, the
> >> > >> current FAT check returns an error. However, the FAT sector exist and
> >> > >> the MBR can tell us where it is.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> This patch make the FAT fs try to find the FAT boot sector on the first
> >> > >> sector of the first partition in case it is not on sector 0.
> >> > >
> >> > > The patch looks good. Not applying it because it's RFC, but I would if
> >> > > you give your ok.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > You have it.
> >>
> >> Thanks, applied
> >
> > Does this work with the fat autodetection
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > J.
> 
> What do you mean ?
> 
> It works when you mount your device as FAT. The FAT fs check is the
> first sector is FAT boot sector. If not, it suppose it is an MBR and
> the FAT boot sector is in the first partition.
check the the next branch

I add the fs detection to do not specify the filesystem type anymore in mount

Best Regards,
J.

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox