From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 9.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net ([178.32.96.204] helo=mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TD9PS-00042G-VY for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 07:36:56 +0000 Received: from mail404.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6130BFF9BB9 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:42:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:34:19 +0200 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Message-ID: <20120916073419.GD25990@game.jcrosoft.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Patch a file in the next branch To: Franck Jullien Cc: barebox On 09:19 Sun 16 Sep , Franck Jullien wrote: > Hi, > > In order to fix fat detection, I need to patch ff.c and filetype.c. > However, ff.c is already patched in next (I need to modify the version > already in next). > Should I generate my patches against next or master ? redo the patch as it more a v2 that an increment one Sacah will replace it Best Regards, J. > > Franck. > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox