From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Carlo Caione <carlo.caione@gmail.com>
Cc: "barebox@lists.infradead.org" <barebox@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:02:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121018070211.GO27665@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7273C8F9-F3BD-4606-8C35-B370AA04C98C@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:27:14AM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:04:44PM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote:
> >> +
> >> +static struct clk ref_3_clk = {
> >> + .rate = 3 * 1000 * 1000,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct clk ref_1_clk = {
> >> + .rate = 1 * 1000 * 1000,
> >> +};
> >
> > Add a 'select COMMON_CLK' to your Kconfig and do a:
> >
> > clk_dummy = clk_fixed("dummy", 0);
> > clk_ref_3 = clk_fixed("ref3", 3 * 1000 * 1000);
> > clk_ref_1 = clk_fixed("ref1", 1 * 1000 * 1000);
> >
> > Then you can drop your clk code and get a clk_dump command
> > which you can use to see what clocks you have.
>
> RFC
>
> ok I ask here before submitting the whole set because I'm not sure if this is a convenient solution.
> I'm not sure if you are suggesting to have two different clock definition one for clk_fixed and the other one for clkdev,
> so I was thinking something like:
>
> enum brcm_clks {
> dummy, clk_ref_3, clk_ref_1, clks_max
> };
>
> static struct clk *clks[clks_max];
>
> int brmc_clk_create(struct clk *clk, const char *con_id, const char *dev_id)
> {
> struct clk_lookup *clkdev;
>
> clkdev = clkdev_alloc(clk, con_id, dev_id);
> if (!clkdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> clkdev_add(clkdev);
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int bcm2835_clk_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> clks[dummy] = clk_fixed("dummy", 0);
> ret = brmc_clk_create(clks[dummy], "apb_pclk", NULL);
> if (ret)
> goto clk_err;
>
> clks[clk_ref_3] = clk_fixed("ref3", 3 * 1000 * 1000);
> ret = brmc_clk_create(clks[clk_ref_3], NULL, "uart0-pl0110");
> if (ret)
> goto clk_err;
>
> clks[clk_ref_1] = clk_fixed("ref1", 1 * 1000 * 1000);
> ret = brmc_clk_create(clks[clk_ref_1], NULL, "bcm2835-cs");
> if (ret)
> goto clk_err;
The above is basically what I was thinking of. The only thing I see that
this *looks* like there is exactly one lookup per clock. This indeed is
the case currenty here, but this does not have to be true. A clock may
have multiple lookups, for example the ref3 clk may also be used by the
lcd controller or something else. So I suggest to first register all
clocks and the lookups afterwards.
What you have as brmc_clk_create could well be a generic helper
function, it will be useful for others aswell.
BTW error checking here is a good idea, but a rollback of the allocated
resources will be unnecessary as you are doomed anyway when something
fails here.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 18:04 [PATCH 0/5] BCM2835/Raspberry-Pi support Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] BCM2835: add clocksource driver Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] BCM2835: add gpio driver Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 21:09 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM1176: add support Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch) Carlo Caione
2012-10-16 21:24 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 6:51 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-17 7:01 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 7:25 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-10-17 8:31 ` Carlo Caione
2012-10-17 21:00 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-10-17 22:27 ` Carlo Caione
2012-10-18 7:02 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2012-10-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] Raspberry-Pi: add support (board) Carlo Caione
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-18 19:42 [PATCH 0/5] BCM2835/Raspberry-Pi support Carlo Caione
2012-10-18 19:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch) Carlo Caione
2012-10-13 14:00 [PATCH 0/5] BCM2835/Raspberry-Pi support Carlo Caione
2012-10-13 14:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch) Carlo Caione
2012-10-13 11:22 [PATCH 0/5] BCM2835/Raspberry-Pi Carlo Caione
2012-10-13 11:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] BCM2835: add support (arch) Carlo Caione
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121018070211.GO27665@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=carlo.caione@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox