From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 10.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.52.148] helo=mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TkVCM-0007i6-2E for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:33:15 +0000 Received: from mail188.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 609AA1080166 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:32:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:22:17 +0100 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Message-ID: <20121217072217.GC26483@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <20121213163758.GB26483@game.jcrosoft.org> <20121214231514.GC26326@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121214231514.GC26326@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] introduction of dmesg support To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On 00:15 Sat 15 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:37:58PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > HI, > > > > we currently have 2 fifo at comsole level one for input one for output > > we fill the output fifo before any console is registered and then > > empty it > > > > Now we introduce a new mecanism as in the kernel dmesg > > > > we will always fill the output kfifo with drivers output > > > > as in barebox we have 2 world > > > > device/drivers and applicaiotn (commands) > > > > so for now on drivers will have to use pr_xxx and dev_xxx and > > application will use printf > > > > dmesg will print the kfifo at any time > > > > we will extend this later with more control of what the drivers output > > on the console or just in the fifo > > > > This new eature is optionnal if dmes is disable we continue as before > > > > Generally I like the idea. Overall I think it's nice to be able to > control the verbosity during runtime. This is the plan but as a second step Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox