From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1U5fnM-0008K5-5E for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:06:56 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:06:52 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20130213170652.GD1906@pengutronix.de> References: <1360755704-24105-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> <1360755704-24105-3-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1360755704-24105-3-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: barebox-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] ARM: clps711x: Adds config option for CPU PLL multiplier To: Alexander Shiyan Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:41:38PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan > --- > arch/arm/boards/clep7212/lowlevel.c | 6 +++++- > arch/arm/mach-clps711x/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-clps711x/include/mach/clps711x.h | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-clps711x/lowlevel.c | 7 +++++-- > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/clep7212/lowlevel.c b/arch/arm/boards/clep7212/lowlevel.c > index b7d6d1d..fcf8285 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boards/clep7212/lowlevel.c > +++ b/arch/arm/boards/clep7212/lowlevel.c > @@ -14,9 +14,13 @@ > > #include > > +#if (CONFIG_CLPS711X_CPU_PLL_MULT < 20) || (CONFIG_CLPS711X_CPU_PLL_MULT > 50) > +# error "CPU PLL multiplier out of range" > +#endif > + > void __naked __bare_init barebox_arm_reset_vector(void) > { > arm_cpu_lowlevel_init(); > > - clps711x_barebox_entry(); > + clps711x_barebox_entry(CONFIG_CLPS711X_CPU_PLL_MULT); I don't quite understand why you want to have this configurable. I mean this is a single board only, why not simply run it with the maximum allowed frequency? Or does this board come with multiple SoCs for which different maximum values exist? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox