From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([94.23.35.102]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UboIP-0007jY-B7 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 08:39:49 +0000 Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:39:24 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni Message-ID: <20130513103924.0506f211@skate> In-Reply-To: <20130513081907.GJ32299@pengutronix.de> References: <1368357969-21633-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130513081907.GJ32299@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-mvebu: drop useless clkdev.h To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Dear Sascha Hauer, On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:19:07 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > As suggested by Antony Pavlov, get rid of the useless clkdev.h in > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > > Folded this into the original patch adding it. Just a development process question: since you're folding it, it means that you're rebasing the 'next' branch constantly? This sounds off for a public branch on top of which people might be basing some more work, no? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox