From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UcVgM-0000F9-QI for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 15 May 2013 06:59:28 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:59:02 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20130515065902.GE32299@pengutronix.de> References: <1367958099-5063-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <6061FD58-D248-4A13-98E4-7AAD7A80CFCF@jcrosoft.com> <20130508182526.40de08c6@e6520eb> <1368600373.828822510@f150.mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1368600373.828822510@f150.mail.ru> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "nand_base: detect more ONFI flash" To: Alexander Shiyan Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:46:13AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > >> this brake the nand support on at91sam9x5ek > > > >> where we have a non compliant ONFI nand > > > >> NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xda (Hynix NAND 256MiB 3,3V 8-bit), 256MiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64 > > > >> > > > >> This reverts commit 4c2bdc8728016b3412523e3264651651fe752860. > > > > > > > > Thank you for letting us know that this patch causes a regression for > > > > you. I this happens, please first try and fix the regression. If that > > > > doesn't work please tell us what about the original patch is so wrong > > > > that it needs to be reverted. With a good explanation it could be that > > > > someone else has an idea. And whatever you do, put the original author, > > > > Eric in this case, on Cc. > > > > > > This commit was supposed just able to detect that a Nand is ONFI > > > > > > but instead it brake supported Nand > > > > > > So Eric can fix it but I've not time to debug this before 1 month > > > and the few platform that use ONFI are all busy > > > > > > So as the commit just allow to detect a band is ONFI can we revert it > > > > > > to keep non-ONFI Nand to work > > > > > IIRC, I tested this patch on some i.MX board with non ONFI NAND flash > > and that worked fine unless I made a mistake in my tests which is > > always possible. > > > > I've just sent a patch which may fix your problem, please give it a try > > (only compile tested, not tested on real hardware). > > What is a patch to fix this? I've got some errors after update to latest master tree: This one: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.barebox/8883 Eric, you mentioned you would send a final version of this patch. Could you do this? master is still broken. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox