From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VLWgT-0000pw-0I for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:09:38 +0000 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:09:14 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20130916110914.GZ30088@pengutronix.de> References: <1379321300-8085-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1379321300-8085-9-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20130916104041.GB16832@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130916104041.GB16832@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] ARM: socfpga: Add FPGA programming command To: Steffen Trumtrar Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi Steffen, On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40:41PM +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:48:17AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > This adds a simple socfpga specific 'fpga' command to load a firmware > > to the FPGA. For the moment this is enough, but should we get more > > FPGA support it might be a good idea to introduce some generic framework > > and command. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig | 5 + > > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/fpga.c | 422 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/socfpga-regs.h | 2 + > > 4 files changed, 430 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/fpga.c > > > > Why did you chose to have an extra command for fpga loading instead of having > just a (block)device? Do you see any future advantage in that or is it just > because of the port from u-boot? I know that they need an extra fpga command, but > they also have an extra mmcload command and stuff. Main reason was that I was unsure how good a block device will be when we get a different firmware format to load (rbf vs. sof vs. something else) Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox