From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WFL4M-0007xf-31 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:04:59 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:04:36 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Message-ID: <20140217100436.GD1844@pengutronix.de> References: <1392282773-7314-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1392282773-7314-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] read_file: Use read_full To: Sascha Hauer Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:12:53AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > At least NFS does not fulfill read requests > 1024 bytes at once. > Use read_full in read_file as read doesn't guarantee that the > whole request can be read at once. > = > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig Thanks Uwe -- = Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox