From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WWVn4-0000Xe-F7 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:58:07 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id c11so3519572lbj.12 for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 11:57:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 23:00:29 +0400 From: Antony Pavlov Message-Id: <20140405230029.876959920a802447aeb9720f@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: RFC: barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload To: Michel Stam Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi! I have seen your recent activity on barebox-x86 improvements. IMHO using barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload can be beneficial for barebox = promotion. Please see http://www.coreboot.org/Payloads --=A0 Best regards, =A0 Antony Pavlov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox