From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Xz2Vc-0000sZ-BP for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:06:17 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:05:53 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20141211120553.GI30369@pengutronix.de> References: <1418289327-28310-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <1418289327-28310-5-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1418289327-28310-5-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm/cpu/lowlevel: invalidate i-cache before enabling To: Uwe =?iso-8859-15?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:15:27AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > Architecturally the cache contents are undefined so it might well > contain stale data at reset. So better be save than sorry. > = > I verifyed that the added instructions are defined for both, ARMv6 and > ARMv7, using the ARM Architecture Reference Manual, ARMv7-A and ARMv7-R > edition (ARM DDI 0406C.c). > = > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig > --- > arch/arm/cpu/lowlevel.S | 14 +++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > = > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/lowlevel.S b/arch/arm/cpu/lowlevel.S > index dd0f75a8802a..af2b0a8ac93a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/lowlevel.S > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/lowlevel.S > @@ -11,7 +11,19 @@ ENTRY(arm_cpu_lowlevel_init) > msr cpsr, r12 > = > #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >=3D 6 > +/* > + * Invalidate instruction cache and branch predictor. Even if the > + * i-cache is off it might contain stale entries that are better > + * discarded before enabling the cache. > + */ Please indent like the other comments > + /* ICIALLU: Invalidate all instruction caches to PoU */ > + mcr p15, 0, r12, c7, c5, 0 > + /* BPIALL: Invalidate all branch predictors */ > + mcr p15, 0, r12, c7, c5, 6 > + /* DSB, ensure completion of the invalidation */ > + mcr p15, 0, r12, c7, c10, 4 > /* > + * ISB, ensure instruction fetch path is in sync. Should this comment be in 2/4? > * Note that the ARM Architecture Reference Manual, ARMv7-A and ARMv7-R > * edition (ARM DDI 0406C.c) doesn't define this instruction in the > * ARMv6 part (D12.7.10). It only has: "Support of additional > @@ -19,7 +31,7 @@ ENTRY(arm_cpu_lowlevel_init) > * But an earlier version of the ARMARM (ARM DDI 0100I) does define it > * as "Flush prefetch buffer (PrefetchFlush)". > */ > - mcr p15, 0, r12, c7, c5, 4 /* ISB */ > + mcr p15, 0, r12, c7, c5, 4 This comment was just introduced in 2/4. Sascha -- = Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox