* [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors
@ 2015-01-26 21:34 Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-26 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: smc1111: extend the driver for 91c94 and 91c96 support Robert Jarzmik
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robert Jarzmik @ 2015-01-26 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Smc network IPs can be wired up in different funny ways. For example the
lubbock pxa25x development platform wires all address lines shifted by
2, ie. bus A2 is smc91c96 A0, bus A3 is smc91c96 A1 etc ...
In order to cope with the different possible combination without
clobbering the driver, allow the platform data to provide specific
accessors, and put the wiring mess inside.
By default, the old behaviour using the 32 bit accesses is kept.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
---
drivers/net/smc91111.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
include/net/smc91111.h | 13 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91111.c b/drivers/net/smc91111.c
index 100688c..3e66c4d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smc91111.c
+++ b/drivers/net/smc91111.c
@@ -434,20 +434,9 @@
*/
#define MEMORY_WAIT_TIME 16
-struct accessors {
- void (*ob)(unsigned, void __iomem *);
- void (*ow)(unsigned, void __iomem *);
- void (*ol)(unsigned long, void __iomem *);
- void (*osl)(void __iomem *, const void *, int);
- unsigned (*ib)(void __iomem *);
- unsigned (*iw)(void __iomem *);
- unsigned long (*il)(void __iomem *);
- void (*isl)(void __iomem *, void*, int);
-};
-
struct smc91c111_priv {
struct mii_bus miibus;
- struct accessors a;
+ struct smc91111_accessors a;
void __iomem *base;
int qemu_fixup;
};
@@ -479,48 +468,50 @@ struct smc91c111_priv {
#define ETH_ZLEN 60
-static void a_outb(unsigned value, void __iomem *offset)
+static void a_outb(unsigned value, void __iomem *base, unsigned int offset)
{
writeb(value, offset);
}
-static void a_outw(unsigned value, void __iomem *offset)
+static void a_outw(unsigned value, void __iomem *base, unsigned int offset)
{
writew(value, offset);
}
-static void a_outl(unsigned long value, void __iomem *offset)
+static void a_outl(unsigned long value, void __iomem *base, unsigned int offset)
{
writel(value, offset);
}
-static void a_outsl(void __iomem *offset, const void *data, int count)
+static void a_outsl(void __iomem *base, unsigned int offset,
+ const void *data, int count)
{
- writesl(offset, data, count);
+ writesl(base + offset, data, count);
}
-static unsigned a_inb(void __iomem *offset)
+static unsigned a_inb(void __iomem *base, unsigned int offset)
{
return readb(offset);
}
-static unsigned a_inw(void __iomem *offset)
+static unsigned a_inw(void __iomem *base, unsigned int offset)
{
return readw(offset);
}
-static unsigned long a_inl(void __iomem *offset)
+static unsigned long a_inl(void __iomem *base, unsigned int offset)
{
return readl(offset);
}
-static inline void a_insl(void __iomem *offset, void *data, int count)
+static inline void a_insl(void __iomem *base, unsigned int offset,
+ void *data, int count)
{
- readsl(offset, data, count);
+ readsl(base + offset, data, count);
}
/* access happens via a 32 bit bus */
-static const struct accessors access_via_32bit = {
+static const struct smc91111_accessors access_via_32bit = {
.ob = a_outb,
.ow = a_outw,
.ol = a_outl,
@@ -536,46 +527,46 @@ static const struct accessors access_via_32bit = {
static inline void SMC_outb(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned value,
unsigned offset)
{
- (p->a.ob)(value, p->base + offset);
+ (p->a.ob)(value, p->base, offset);
}
static inline void SMC_outw(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned value,
unsigned offset)
{
- (p->a.ow)(value, p->base + offset);
+ (p->a.ow)(value, p->base, offset);
}
static inline void SMC_outl(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned long value,
unsigned offset)
{
- (p->a.ol)(value, p->base + offset);
+ (p->a.ol)(value, p->base, offset);
}
static inline void SMC_outsl(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset,
const void *data, int count)
{
- (p->a.osl)(p->base + offset, data, count);
+ (p->a.osl)(p->base, offset, data, count);
}
static inline unsigned SMC_inb(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset)
{
- return (p->a.ib)(p->base + offset);
+ return (p->a.ib)(p->base, offset);
}
static inline unsigned SMC_inw(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset)
{
- return (p->a.iw)(p->base + offset);
+ return (p->a.iw)(p->base, offset);
}
static inline unsigned long SMC_inl(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset)
{
- return (p->a.il)(p->base + offset);
+ return (p->a.il)(p->base, offset);
}
static inline void SMC_insl(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset,
void *data, int count)
{
- (p->a.isl)(p->base + offset, data, count);
+ (p->a.isl)(p->base, offset, data, count);
}
static inline void SMC_SELECT_BANK(struct smc91c111_priv *p, int bank)
@@ -1333,15 +1324,16 @@ static int smc91c111_probe(struct device_d *dev)
edev->priv = (struct smc91c111_priv *)(edev + 1);
priv = edev->priv;
+ priv->a = access_via_32bit;
if (dev->platform_data) {
struct smc91c111_pdata *pdata = dev->platform_data;
priv->qemu_fixup = pdata->qemu_fixup;
+ if (pdata->accessors)
+ priv->a = *pdata->accessors;
}
- priv->a = access_via_32bit;
-
edev->init = smc91c111_init_dev;
edev->open = smc91c111_eth_open;
edev->send = smc91c111_eth_send;
diff --git a/include/net/smc91111.h b/include/net/smc91111.h
index 0b2d49b..d56b1a9 100644
--- a/include/net/smc91111.h
+++ b/include/net/smc91111.h
@@ -7,8 +7,21 @@
#ifndef __SMC91111_H__
#define __SMC91111_H__
+struct smc91111_accessors {
+ void (*ob)(unsigned, void __iomem *, unsigned);
+ void (*ow)(unsigned, void __iomem *, unsigned);
+ void (*ol)(unsigned long, void __iomem *, unsigned);
+ void (*osl)(void __iomem *, unsigned, const void *, int);
+ unsigned (*ib)(void __iomem *, unsigned);
+ unsigned (*iw)(void __iomem *, unsigned);
+ unsigned long (*il)(void __iomem *, unsigned);
+ void (*isl)(void __iomem *, unsigned, void*, int);
+ void *private;
+};
+
struct smc91c111_pdata {
int qemu_fixup;
+ struct smc91111_accessors *accessors;
};
#endif /* __SMC91111_H__ */
--
2.1.0
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] net: smc1111: extend the driver for 91c94 and 91c96 support
2015-01-26 21:34 [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors Robert Jarzmik
@ 2015-01-26 21:34 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-26 21:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: smc1111: improve debug capability Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-29 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors Sascha Hauer
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robert Jarzmik @ 2015-01-26 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
All the smcs family chips 91c94, 91c96, 91c100, 91c111 share almost the
same behavior and register sets. The noticeable exceptions are coped
with in this patch, ie :
- 91c94 and 91c96 only have an internal 10 Mbps phy
The registers used for phy discovery on later chips will corrupt the
91c96 state.
- 91c94 and 91c96 have a control and config register quite different
from their 91c1xx conterparts
A platform data user defined couple of registers is introduced. If
these values are 0, 91c1xx legacy behavior is assumed.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
---
drivers/net/smc91111.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/net/smc91111.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91111.c b/drivers/net/smc91111.c
index 3e66c4d..880bf75 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smc91111.c
+++ b/drivers/net/smc91111.c
@@ -439,6 +439,10 @@ struct smc91c111_priv {
struct smc91111_accessors a;
void __iomem *base;
int qemu_fixup;
+ int version;
+ int revision;
+ unsigned int control_setup;
+ unsigned int config_setup;
};
#if (SMC_DEBUG > 2 )
@@ -854,6 +858,7 @@ static int smc91c111_phy_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phyaddr, int phyreg)
static void smc91c111_reset(struct eth_device *edev)
{
struct smc91c111_priv *priv = (struct smc91c111_priv *)edev->priv;
+ int rev_vers;
/* This resets the registers mostly to defaults, but doesn't
affect EEPROM. That seems unnecessary */
@@ -869,8 +874,11 @@ static void smc91c111_reset(struct eth_device *edev)
/* Release from possible power-down state */
/* Configuration register is not affected by Soft Reset */
- SMC_outw(priv, SMC_inw(priv, CONFIG_REG) | CONFIG_EPH_POWER_EN,
- CONFIG_REG);
+ if (priv->config_setup)
+ SMC_outw(priv, priv->config_setup, CONFIG_REG);
+ else
+ SMC_outw(priv, SMC_inw(priv, CONFIG_REG) | CONFIG_EPH_POWER_EN,
+ CONFIG_REG);
SMC_SELECT_BANK(priv, 0);
@@ -883,7 +891,10 @@ static void smc91c111_reset(struct eth_device *edev)
/* set the control register */
SMC_SELECT_BANK(priv, 1);
- SMC_outw(priv, CTL_DEFAULT, CTL_REG);
+ if (priv->control_setup)
+ SMC_outw(priv, priv->control_setup, CTL_REG);
+ else
+ SMC_outw(priv, CTL_DEFAULT, CTL_REG);
/* Reset the MMU */
SMC_SELECT_BANK(priv, 2);
@@ -899,6 +910,14 @@ static void smc91c111_reset(struct eth_device *edev)
/* Disable all interrupts */
SMC_outb(priv, 0, IM_REG);
+
+ /* Check chip revision (91c94, 91c96, 91c100, ...) */
+ SMC_SELECT_BANK(priv, 3);
+ rev_vers = SMC_inb(priv, REV_REG);
+ priv->revision = (rev_vers >> 4) & 0xf;
+ priv->version = rev_vers & 0xf;
+ dev_info(edev->parent, "chip is revision=%2d, version=%2d\n",
+ priv->revision, priv->version);
}
static void smc91c111_enable(struct eth_device *edev)
@@ -918,10 +937,16 @@ static int smc91c111_eth_open(struct eth_device *edev)
/* Configure the Receive/Phy Control register */
SMC_SELECT_BANK(priv, 0);
- SMC_outw(priv, RPC_DEFAULT, RPC_REG);
+ if (priv->revision > 4)
+ SMC_outw(priv, RPC_DEFAULT, RPC_REG);
smc91c111_enable(edev);
+ if (priv->revision <= 4) {
+ dev_info(edev->parent, "force link at 10Mpbs on internal phy\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
ret = phy_device_connect(edev, &priv->miibus, 0, NULL,
0, PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA);
@@ -1332,6 +1357,10 @@ static int smc91c111_probe(struct device_d *dev)
priv->qemu_fixup = pdata->qemu_fixup;
if (pdata->accessors)
priv->a = *pdata->accessors;
+ if (pdata->config_setup)
+ priv->config_setup = pdata->config_setup;
+ if (pdata->control_setup)
+ priv->control_setup = pdata->control_setup;
}
edev->init = smc91c111_init_dev;
@@ -1353,7 +1382,8 @@ static int smc91c111_probe(struct device_d *dev)
smc91c111_reset(edev);
- mdiobus_register(&priv->miibus);
+ if (priv->revision > 4)
+ mdiobus_register(&priv->miibus);
eth_register(edev);
return 0;
diff --git a/include/net/smc91111.h b/include/net/smc91111.h
index d56b1a9..56f08f0 100644
--- a/include/net/smc91111.h
+++ b/include/net/smc91111.h
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ struct smc91111_accessors {
struct smc91c111_pdata {
int qemu_fixup;
struct smc91111_accessors *accessors;
+ int config_setup;
+ int control_setup;
};
#endif /* __SMC91111_H__ */
--
2.1.0
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] net: smc1111: improve debug capability
2015-01-26 21:34 [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-26 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: smc1111: extend the driver for 91c94 and 91c96 support Robert Jarzmik
@ 2015-01-26 21:34 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-29 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors Sascha Hauer
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robert Jarzmik @ 2015-01-26 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: barebox
Improve smc1111 driver debug messages by printing the register accessed,
the current bank, and the values.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
---
drivers/net/smc91111.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91111.c b/drivers/net/smc91111.c
index 880bf75..76e576a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smc91111.c
+++ b/drivers/net/smc91111.c
@@ -528,55 +528,71 @@ static const struct smc91111_accessors access_via_32bit = {
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ */
-static inline void SMC_outb(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned value,
- unsigned offset)
-{
- (p->a.ob)(value, p->base, offset);
-}
-
-static inline void SMC_outw(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned value,
- unsigned offset)
-{
- (p->a.ow)(value, p->base, offset);
-}
-
-static inline void SMC_outl(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned long value,
- unsigned offset)
-{
- (p->a.ol)(value, p->base, offset);
-}
-
-static inline void SMC_outsl(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset,
- const void *data, int count)
-{
- (p->a.osl)(p->base, offset, data, count);
-}
-
-static inline unsigned SMC_inb(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset)
-{
- return (p->a.ib)(p->base, offset);
-}
-
-static inline unsigned SMC_inw(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset)
-{
- return (p->a.iw)(p->base, offset);
-}
-
-static inline unsigned long SMC_inl(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset)
-{
- return (p->a.il)(p->base, offset);
-}
-
-static inline void SMC_insl(struct smc91c111_priv *p, unsigned offset,
- void *data, int count)
-{
- (p->a.isl)(p->base, offset, data, count);
-}
-
-static inline void SMC_SELECT_BANK(struct smc91c111_priv *p, int bank)
-{
- SMC_outw(p, bank, BANK_SELECT);
-}
+static unsigned last_bank;
+#define SMC_outb(p, value, offset) \
+ do { \
+ PRINTK3("\t%s:%d outb: %s[%1d:0x%04x] = 0x%02x\n", \
+ __func__, __LINE__, #offset, last_bank, \
+ (offset), (value)); \
+ ((p)->a.ob)((value), (p)->base, (offset)); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define SMC_outw(p, value, offset) \
+ do { \
+ PRINTK3("\t%s:%d outw: %s[%1d:0x%04x] = 0x%04x\n", \
+ __func__, __LINE__, #offset, last_bank, \
+ (offset), (value)); \
+ ((p)->a.ow)((value), (p)->base, (offset)); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define SMC_outl(p, value, offset) \
+ do { \
+ PRINTK3("\t%s:%d outl: %s[%1d:0x%04x] = 0x%08lx\n", \
+ __func__, __LINE__, #offset, last_bank, \
+ (offset), (unsigned long)(value)); \
+ ((p)->a.ol)((value), (p)->base, (offset)); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define SMC_outsl(p, offset, data, count)\
+ do { \
+ PRINTK3("\t%s:%d outsl: %5d@%p -> [%1d:0x%04x]\n", \
+ __func__, __LINE__, (count) * 4, data, \
+ last_bank, (offset)); \
+ ((p)->a.osl)((p)->base, (offset), data, (count)); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define SMC_inb(p, offset) \
+ ({ \
+ unsigned _v = ((p)->a.ib)((p)->base, (offset)); \
+ PRINTK3("\t%s:%d inb: %s[%1d:0x%04x] -> 0x%02x\n", \
+ __func__, __LINE__, #offset, last_bank, \
+ (offset), _v); \
+ _v; })
+
+#define SMC_inw(p, offset) \
+ ({ \
+ unsigned _v = ((p)->a.iw)((p)->base, (offset)); \
+ PRINTK3("\t%s:%d inw: %s[%1d:0x%04x] -> 0x%04x\n", \
+ __func__, __LINE__, #offset, last_bank, \
+ (offset), _v); \
+ _v; })
+
+#define SMC_inl(p, offset) \
+ ({ \
+ unsigned long _v = ((p)->a.il)((p)->base, (offset)); \
+ PRINTK3("\t%s:%d inl: %s[%1d:0x%04x] -> 0x%08lx\n", \
+ __func__, __LINE__, #offset, last_bank, \
+ (offset), _v); \
+ _v; })
+
+#define SMC_insl(p, offset, data, count) \
+ ((p)->a.isl)((p)->base, (offset), data, (count))
+
+#define SMC_SELECT_BANK(p, bank) \
+ do { \
+ SMC_outw(p, bank & 0xf, BANK_SELECT); \
+ last_bank = bank & 0xf; \
+ } while (0)
#if SMC_DEBUG > 2
static void print_packet( unsigned char * buf, int length )
--
2.1.0
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors
2015-01-26 21:34 [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-26 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: smc1111: extend the driver for 91c94 and 91c96 support Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-26 21:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: smc1111: improve debug capability Robert Jarzmik
@ 2015-01-29 9:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-01-29 14:01 ` robert.jarzmik
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2015-01-29 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Jarzmik; +Cc: barebox
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:34:08PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Smc network IPs can be wired up in different funny ways. For example the
> lubbock pxa25x development platform wires all address lines shifted by
> 2, ie. bus A2 is smc91c96 A0, bus A3 is smc91c96 A1 etc ...
Yeah I know, connecting the 91c111 inspired the board designers to many
funny things. Passing function pointers in platform_data is not very
future proof since this doesn't work with device tree. I see that the
Linux driver has device tree support. Does this binding work for you?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors
2015-01-29 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors Sascha Hauer
@ 2015-01-29 14:01 ` robert.jarzmik
2015-01-30 7:37 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: robert.jarzmik @ 2015-01-29 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer; +Cc: barebox
----- Mail original -----
De: "Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
À: "Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Janvier 2015 10:47:20
Objet: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors
> Yeah I know, connecting the 91c111 inspired the board designers to many
> funny things. Passing function pointers in platform_data is not very
> future proof since this doesn't work with device tree. I see that the
> Linux driver has device tree support. Does this binding work for you?
Well, it can't, because lubbock doesn't support device-tree yet, it's on
my todo list for the kernel (and barebox of course). That means there is
no way to even build a device-tree enabled kernel for lubbock ... yet.
Now the binding would work with :
- the address shift being declared (as in kernel driver)
- a set of 16 bit accessors being declared in barebox's smcs9111.c
driver (and not in platform specific accessors)
Would you rather have me change the approach with a new set of accessor
in smcs9111.c, and the shift as a parameter (both platform_data and device-
tree) ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors
2015-01-29 14:01 ` robert.jarzmik
@ 2015-01-30 7:37 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-01-30 8:03 ` Robert Jarzmik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2015-01-30 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robert.jarzmik; +Cc: barebox
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:01:03PM +0100, robert.jarzmik@free.fr wrote:
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> À: "Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Janvier 2015 10:47:20
> Objet: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors
>
> > Yeah I know, connecting the 91c111 inspired the board designers to many
> > funny things. Passing function pointers in platform_data is not very
> > future proof since this doesn't work with device tree. I see that the
> > Linux driver has device tree support. Does this binding work for you?
>
> Well, it can't, because lubbock doesn't support device-tree yet, it's on
> my todo list for the kernel (and barebox of course). That means there is
> no way to even build a device-tree enabled kernel for lubbock ... yet.
>
> Now the binding would work with :
> - the address shift being declared (as in kernel driver)
> - a set of 16 bit accessors being declared in barebox's smcs9111.c
> driver (and not in platform specific accessors)
>
> Would you rather have me change the approach with a new set of accessor
> in smcs9111.c, and the shift as a parameter (both platform_data and device-
> tree) ?
That sounds better. Using accessors in platform_data really is more
flexible, but when switching to device tree we'll need a width/shift
approach anyway.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-30 8:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-26 21:34 [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-26 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: smc1111: extend the driver for 91c94 and 91c96 support Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-26 21:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: smc1111: improve debug capability Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-29 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors Sascha Hauer
2015-01-29 14:01 ` robert.jarzmik
2015-01-30 7:37 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-01-30 8:03 ` Robert Jarzmik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox