Re: [PATCH] makfiles: add emacs syntax highlighting hint

[Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 10:59:41AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 04/02/2015 10:55 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 02.04.2015, 10:35 +0200 schrieb Jean-Christophe
> > PLAGNIOL-VILLARD:
> >> On 00:33 Wed 01 Apr     , Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >>> This patches makes a standard emacs to recognise the files as makefiles.
> >> not a fan of vi or emacs stuff in file
> >>
> >> btw I plan to drop the images/ and move them back to the ARCH
> >>
> > I'm not sure if this is time spent well.
> > 
> > Moving the generated images _again_ will get you into some serious
> > discussions with the people integrating barebox into BSP builds. We
> > finally settled for a single directory going forward and changing this
> > is not a good idea.
> 
> +1
> 
> > Or did you mean just moving the rules out of images/, but keeping the
> > generated binaries there? This might in fact be doable.
> 
> On the first sight there's some marvell image related
> doubling/copy-paste leftovers in ARCH and in images/.
> 

reminds me to send patches for RPi build which doesn't place the barebox
image into "images/", otherwise I get a [0]. It's placed in root
directory of barebox "barebox.bin". :-)

- Alex

[0] https://www.mail-archive.com/ptxdist@pengutronix.de/msg09539.html

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox