From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YrouP-0005cU-IA for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:42:18 +0000 Received: by lbcga7 with SMTP id ga7so95603555lbc.1 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 07:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:47:17 +0300 From: Antony Pavlov Message-Id: <20150511174717.fd248fd24a066b26a2b73c7b@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: are some ppc-related patches absent in May-2015 barebox-next? To: Sascha Hauer , Juergen Borleis Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi, Sascha and Juergen! I have had rebased one of my old private branches over May-2015 barebox-nex= t. I have found that some ppc-related patches are present in my old private br= anch but these patches are absent in the May-2015 barebox-next branch. I'm speaking about this '[RFC] Add PowerPC MPC5125 support' patchseries http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2014-October/02110= 8.html At the other hand I can't find any comments on this patchseries in the mail= list (so, there is no 'Applied, thanks!' response on this patcheseries). AFAIR I have not intentionaly picked any patches from this patchseries to m= y private branch. May be these patches for not very long time were in the next branch and wer= e skipped one day? --=A0 Best regards, =A0 Antony Pavlov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox