From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aMWGI-0006LB-4H for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:36:02 +0000 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:35:40 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20160122073540.GP13058@pengutronix.de> References: <1453190117-27933-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootm: Add option to force booting signed images To: Yegor Yefremov Cc: Barebox List Hi Yegor, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:03:17AM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > With CONFIG_BOOTM_FORCE_SIGNED_IMAGES the bootm code will refuse to boot > > unsigned images. Since currently FIT is the only image type which > > supports signing this means we with this option we enforce using FIT > > comma is missing after "supports signing", "we" after "means" must go away > > > images. All additionally passed in device trees and initrds will be > > a word is missing between "All" and "additionally" I think not, I reread the sentence and it still makes sense to me. I fixed the other things you mentioned. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox