From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aYriv-0002gN-MA for barebox@lists.infradead.Org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:56:38 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:56:15 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20160225085615.GD3939@pengutronix.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: mount fat regression To: Philippe Leduc Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Philippe Leduc wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that there is a regression in the mount command for fat > filesystem: if I try to mount a partition that is formatted with > fatfs, I got this error: > > mount /dev/mmc2.netcom > mount: No such file or directory > > I do not have the problem with a fat formatted with Windows or Linux. > > Do you have an idea? Are you sure this is a regression? Did this work before? I don't think that FAT support in general is broken, it's probably something with your special setup. What does 'filetype /dev/mmc2.netcom' give you? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox