From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from asavdk4.altibox.net ([109.247.116.15]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1b5fK2-0003Z2-QL for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 20:22:31 +0000 Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 22:22:03 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg Message-ID: <20160525202203.GA23045@ravnborg.org> References: <1463992010-31537-1-git-send-email-t.remmet@phytec.de> <20160525133302.GD21031@pengutronix.de> <1464187352.4917.26.camel@lws-tremmet.phytec.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1464187352.4917.26.camel@lws-tremmet.phytec.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/62] Update UBI To: Teresa Remmet Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 04:42:32PM +0200, Teresa Remmet wrote: > Hello Robert, > > Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2016, 15:33 +0200 schrieb Robert Schwebel: > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:25:48AM +0200, Teresa Remmet wrote: > > > this series is more or less just a cherry-pick of the UBI patches > > > from kernel to version v4.6. Rework was need for some patches to make > > > them apply and work for barebox. > > > > These patches should have your Signed-off-by:. > > I added the Signed-off to all patches I had to touch manually due to a > conflict. A lot applied luckily just out of the box. S-o-b document the path from original author until commitet. So if a patch passed through 10 persons there should be 10 S-o-b even if noe of them touched the original patch. The the S-o-b can be used to track down how the patch ended up in barebox. Sam _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox