From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] state: don't keep pointers to any device tree data
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:13:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915081336.fgw53sbm3youxupt@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160915061014.16943-1-m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:10:13AM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> Caching pointers to device tree nodes or names is not save. The barebox
> internal device tree may be changed by loading a new device tree or through
> fixup handlers.
> Use local copies of the full path instead and resolve the node as needed.
>
This should be two patches, one for backend->of_path and one
state->root. When reviewing this I first had to understand that this
patch has two unrelated changes.
> Signed-off-by: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> common/state/backend.c | 3 ++-
> common/state/state.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> common/state/state.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/state/backend.c b/common/state/backend.c
> index 2f2e6dfd32d1..5235bb0283dd 100644
> --- a/common/state/backend.c
> +++ b/common/state/backend.c
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ int state_backend_init(struct state_backend *backend, struct device_d *dev,
> if (ret)
> goto out_free_format;
>
> - backend->of_path = of_path;
> + backend->of_path = xstrdup(of_path);
>
> return 0;
>
> @@ -185,4 +185,5 @@ void state_backend_free(struct state_backend *backend)
> state_storage_free(&backend->storage);
> if (backend->format)
> state_format_free(backend->format);
> + free(backend->of_path);
> }
> diff --git a/common/state/state.c b/common/state/state.c
> index 9b1d4edef132..0c329cd67548 100644
> --- a/common/state/state.c
> +++ b/common/state/state.c
> @@ -202,15 +202,19 @@ struct device_node *state_to_node(struct state *state,
> enum state_convert conv)
> {
> struct device_node *child;
> - struct device_node *root;
> + struct device_node *root, *state_root;
> int ret;
>
> - root = of_new_node(parent, state->root->name);
> + state_root = of_find_node_by_path(state->of_path);
> + if (!state_root)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
Shouldn't you create the node if it's not there in the target device
tree?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-15 6:10 Michael Olbrich
2016-09-15 6:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] state: fix finding the correct parent node Michael Olbrich
2016-09-15 8:13 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2016-09-15 9:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] state: don't keep pointers to any device tree data Michael Olbrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160915081336.fgw53sbm3youxupt@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.olbrich@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox