From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from asavdk4.altibox.net ([109.247.116.15]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1blu61-00015G-B4 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:38:38 +0000 Received: from ravnborg.org (unknown [188.228.89.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asavdk4.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B0B80246 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:38:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:38:11 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg Message-ID: <20160919083811.GA15066@ravnborg.org> References: <20160917170731.GA30325@ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160917170731.GA30325@ravnborg.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] strings: new command To: Barebox List > I was in a situation where I missed "strings". > So here it is.... > I started out with cat.c - but ended up re-writing everything. > > It has seen light testing on my x86 box. > Ran it through checkpatch for good measure - fixed a few things. > > The location in Makefile seems random, so I just put it next to cat. > > Before applying please consider if strings is really > general useful in barebox. In the end I had no use for strings in barebox, so another reason to consider if it is really needed. Sam _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox