From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from asavdk4.altibox.net ([109.247.116.15]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1cURzs-0004h8-SG for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:44:27 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 06:44:00 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg Message-ID: <20170120054400.GA3542@ravnborg.org> References: <20170119150352.5421-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20170120053903.GA25134@ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170120053903.GA25134@ravnborg.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: i.MX: add soc_reset operation To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Barebox List On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 06:39:03AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 04:03:51PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On i.MX21 watchdog type the reset operation is really different > > from the watchdog enable/set timeout operation, so create an > > extra callback for this instead of folding both things together. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer > > --- > > drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c b/drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c > > index 03e116ea2..c736fdaa3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c > > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/imxwd.c > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct imx_wd; > > > > struct imx_wd_ops { > > int (*set_timeout)(struct imx_wd *, int); > > With this change the timeout argument could be unsigned int. > > > + void (*soc_reset)(struct imx_wd *); > > int (*init)(struct imx_wd *); > > }; > > > > @@ -76,10 +77,7 @@ static int imx1_watchdog_set_timeout(struct imx_wd *priv, int timeout) > > return 0; > > } > > > > - if (timeout > 0) > > - val = (timeout * 2 - 1) << 8; > > - else > > - val = 0; > > + val = (timeout * 2 - 1) << 8; > > > > writew(val, priv->base + IMX1_WDOG_WCR); > > writew(IMX1_WDOG_WCR_WDE | val, priv->base + IMX1_WDOG_WCR); > > Otherwise the timeout < 0 should somehow be handled here. Unless we do not bother because this is all local to the file and we know the two call sites. Sam _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox