From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mvebu: make boards pass initial memory size
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:06:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213080605.4v3ldwhyk7xtiodq@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170210155100.16463-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Hi Uwe,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 04:50:59PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> While assuming SZ_64M initially is save and fixed up later, the size of the
> malloc area is determined from this value. So it might make sense for some
> boards to pass the correct version from the start to have more RAM available
> for example to write big images into an FPGA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/boards/globalscale-guruplug/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boards/globalscale-mirabox/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boards/lenovo-ix4-300d/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boards/marvell-armada-xp-gp/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boards/netgear-rn104/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boards/netgear-rn2120/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boards/plathome-openblocks-a6/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boards/plathome-openblocks-ax3/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boards/solidrun-cubox/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boards/usi-topkick/lowlevel.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/lowlevel.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/lowlevel.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 12 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> /*
> * Determining the actual memory size is highly SoC dependent,
> - * but for all SoCs RAM starts at 0x00000000. Therefore, we start
> - * with a minimal memory setup of 64M and probe correct memory size
> - * later.
> + * but for all SoCs RAM starts at 0x00000000. If the available RAM isn't known
> + * at the call-site of mvebu_barebox_entry, using a value that is not too big is
> + * safe. The correct memory size will be probed later.
> */
> #define MVEBU_BOOTUP_MEMORY_BASE 0x00000000
> -#define MVEBU_BOOTUP_MEMORY_SIZE SZ_64M
>
> -void __naked __noreturn mvebu_barebox_entry(void *boarddata)
> +void __naked __noreturn mvebu_barebox_entry(void *boarddata,
> + unsigned long memsize)
> {
> mvebu_remap_registers();
> - barebox_arm_entry(MVEBU_BOOTUP_MEMORY_BASE,
> - MVEBU_BOOTUP_MEMORY_SIZE, boarddata);
> + barebox_arm_entry(MVEBU_BOOTUP_MEMORY_BASE, memsize, boarddata);
> }
I would prefer if you could split mvebu_barebox_entry into
armada_370_xp_barebox_entry, dove_barebox_entry and
kirkwood_barebox_entry. Then you could call the SoC specific SDRAM
detection functions and call barebox with the correct amount of SDRAM
from the start.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-10 15:50 [PATCH 0/2] mvebu: make more RAM available from malloc Uwe Kleine-König
2017-02-10 15:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] mvebu: make boards pass initial memory size Uwe Kleine-König
2017-02-13 8:06 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2017-02-10 15:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] netgear-rn2120: use complete memory from the start Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170213080605.4v3ldwhyk7xtiodq@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox