From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fRBAj-0002ZM-29 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 06:46:54 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 08:46:36 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20180608064636.cv7nx5vpkdioea4f@pengutronix.de> References: <20180607130108.5339-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180607130108.5339-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RESEND v3 00/52] ARM: i.MX8MQ and EVK support To: Andrey Smirnov Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org Hi Andrey, On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 06:00:16AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > RESEND to include ALL of the patches in the series (not just first 38) > > Everyone: > > Picking up where Sascha left off, this is the next version of the > patchset that adds support for i.MX8MQ EVK board. Applied up to 30/52 and most of the rest. For 32 I'd like to ask if it's really worth making several clock functions static inline. It increases the image size by a few kb. We do more often than I like, so isn't there another solution? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox