From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gVI4a-0004qx-G4 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 15:29:52 +0000 Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:29:35 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20181207152935.b3b2ohuslcex4pec@pengutronix.de> References: <9fe4263a-2331-362f-2e68-7563115a3b8a@mev.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9fe4263a-2331-362f-2e68-7563115a3b8a@mev.co.uk> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: GPIO support missing for SoCFPGA? To: Ian Abbott Cc: Barebox List , Steffen Trumtrar Hi Ian, On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 03:19:58PM +0000, Ian Abbott wrote: > Hi, > > Commit 8a680e3c9b5dd8470b7437654877d5439e9a6407 ("ARM: socfpga: Arria10: > support programming FPGA in PBL") deselected GPIOLIB, so none of the SoCFPGA > boards support GPIO any more. There is no mention of this in the commit > message. Was this a deliberate change, or accidental? Where is the best > place to re-enable the option? Should be fixed by 34a9cd2a46 already, no? Sascha commit 34a9cd2a46511510683863d1b07f691665c00d1b Author: Steffen Trumtrar Date: Thu Nov 15 10:05:30 2018 +0100 ARM: socfpga: select GPIOLIB for non-xload SoCFPGA has GPIOs. Select it for the normal bootloader. For the xload barebox, do not select it to not waste space. -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox