From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:01:03 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201838670.425159504.1422540063764.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150129094720.GG12209@pengutronix.de>
----- Mail original -----
De: "Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
À: "Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Janvier 2015 10:47:20
Objet: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors
> Yeah I know, connecting the 91c111 inspired the board designers to many
> funny things. Passing function pointers in platform_data is not very
> future proof since this doesn't work with device tree. I see that the
> Linux driver has device tree support. Does this binding work for you?
Well, it can't, because lubbock doesn't support device-tree yet, it's on
my todo list for the kernel (and barebox of course). That means there is
no way to even build a device-tree enabled kernel for lubbock ... yet.
Now the binding would work with :
- the address shift being declared (as in kernel driver)
- a set of 16 bit accessors being declared in barebox's smcs9111.c
driver (and not in platform specific accessors)
Would you rather have me change the approach with a new set of accessor
in smcs9111.c, and the shift as a parameter (both platform_data and device-
tree) ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-29 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-26 21:34 Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-26 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: smc1111: extend the driver for 91c94 and 91c96 support Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-26 21:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: smc1111: improve debug capability Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-29 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: smc1111: allow platform specific accessors Sascha Hauer
2015-01-29 14:01 ` robert.jarzmik [this message]
2015-01-30 7:37 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-01-30 8:03 ` Robert Jarzmik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201838670.425159504.1422540063764.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net \
--to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox