mail archive of the barebox mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] mtd: nand: Kill the chip->scan_bbt() hook
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:32:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190121083255.4stf3pdjw2wnhj3a@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181028212638.GO14788@lenoch>

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 10:26:38PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> Linux commit e80eba758151 adapted for Barebox:
> 
>   None of the existing drivers are overloading the ->scan_bbt()
>   method, let's get rid of it and replace calls to ->scan_bbt()
>   by nand_create_bbt() ones.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
> index 28a07d4cb..f69453aba 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
> @@ -1201,21 +1201,7 @@ static int mxs_nand_block_bad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, int getchip)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Nominally, the purpose of this function is to look for or create the bad
> - * block table. In fact, since the we call this function at the very end of
> - * the initialization process started by nand_scan(), and we doesn't have a
> - * more formal mechanism, we "hook" this function to continue init process.
> - *
> - * At this point, the physical NAND Flash chips have been identified and
> - * counted, so we know the physical geometry. This enables us to make some
> - * important configuration decisions.
> - *
> - * The return value of this function propogates directly back to this driver's
> - * call to nand_scan(). Anything other than zero will cause this driver to
> - * tear everything down and declare failure.
> - */
> -static int mxs_nand_scan_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +static int mxs_nand_init_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  {
>  	struct nand_chip *nand = mtd->priv;
>  	struct mxs_nand_info *nand_info = nand->priv;
> @@ -1252,8 +1238,7 @@ static int mxs_nand_scan_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  		mtd->block_markbad = mxs_nand_hook_block_markbad;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* We use the reference implementation for bad block management. */
> -	return nand_default_bbt(mtd);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2183,7 +2168,6 @@ static int mxs_nand_probe(struct device_d *dev)
>  	nand->dev_ready		= mxs_nand_device_ready;
>  	nand->select_chip	= mxs_nand_select_chip;
>  	nand->block_bad		= mxs_nand_block_bad;
> -	nand->scan_bbt		= mxs_nand_scan_bbt;
>  
>  	nand->read_byte		= mxs_nand_read_byte;
>  
> @@ -2215,6 +2199,13 @@ static int mxs_nand_probe(struct device_d *dev)
>  
>  	mxs_nand_setup_timing(nand_info);
>  
> +	err = mxs_nand_init_bch(mtd);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err2;
> +	err = nand_create_bbt(mtd);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err2;
> +

By the time nand_create_bbt() is called mtd->read is not yet set, so we
end up with a NULL pointer deref here.

>  	/* second phase scan */
>  	err = nand_scan_tail(mtd);

This call sets mtd->read, so we can call nand_create_bbt() only after
it.

The MXS nand driver plays some funny tricks, so the correct fix is non
obvious to me.

I reverted this patch for now.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-21  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-28 21:19 [PATCH 00/16] NAND update (1st step) Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:21 ` [PATCH 01/16] mtd: nand: refactor chip->block_markbad interface Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:21 ` [PATCH 02/16] mtd: nand: remove multiplied-by-2 block logic Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:22 ` [PATCH 03/16] mtd: nand: hide in-memory BBT implementation details Ladislav Michl
2018-10-29 10:07   ` Ladislav Michl
2018-10-29 11:43     ` Ladislav Michl
2018-10-30  9:07       ` Sascha Hauer
2018-10-28 21:22 ` [PATCH 04/16] mtd: nand: remove NAND_BBT_SCANEMPTY Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:22 ` [PATCH 05/16] mtd: nand: Request strength instead of bytes for soft BCH Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:23 ` [PATCH 06/16] mtd: atmel_nand: Add per board ECC setup Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:23 ` [PATCH 07/16] mtd: nand: simplify nand_bch_init() usage Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:24 ` [PATCH 08/16] mtd: nand_bbt: kill NAND_BBT_SCANALLPAGES Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:24 ` [PATCH 09/16] mtd: nand_bbt: handle error case for nand_create_badblock_pattern() Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:25 ` [PATCH 10/16] mtd: nand_bbt: make nand_scan_bbt() static Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:25 ` [PATCH 11/16] mtd: nand_bbt: unify/fix error handling in nand_scan_bbt() Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:25 ` [PATCH 12/16] mtd: nand_bbt: Move BBT block selection logic out of write_bbt() Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:26 ` [PATCH 13/16] mtd: nand_bbt: scan for next free bbt block if writing bbt fails Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:26 ` [PATCH 14/16] mtd: nand: Kill the chip->scan_bbt() hook Ladislav Michl
2019-01-21  8:32   ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2018-10-28 21:27 ` [PATCH 15/16] mtd: nand: Kill cellinfo Ladislav Michl
2018-10-28 21:27 ` [PATCH 16/16] mtd: nand: detect OOB size for Toshiba 24nm raw SLC Ladislav Michl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190121083255.4stf3pdjw2wnhj3a@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ladis@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox