From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1go2kU-0003xR-1z for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:59:02 +0000 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:58:32 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20190128085832.m3hu6jb6dqfjtkw2@pengutronix.de> References: <1b58b623-806b-7e15-7419-7fdd97a85f2a@data-modul.com> <20190111111316.i4sbti24awp2in3e@pengutronix.de> <4561415.JmzvUQDMJA@llp-hemp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4561415.JmzvUQDMJA@llp-hemp> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: build barebox for imx8mqevk To: Christian Hemp Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 02:16:40PM +0100, Christian Hemp wrote: > Hello Sascha, > > Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2019, 12:13:16 CET schrieb Sascha Hauer: > > You have to pass ARCH=arm as environment variable. It seems that you > > pass ARCH=arm64. > > > > In barebox both ARM 32bit and 64bit are handled under arch/arm, > > nevertheless you have to pass a suitable toolchain. > > Is there a specific reason why ARM 32bit and 64bit are handled under arch/arm > and not separate? Yes. They share a lot of code. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox