From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gveKR-0008Ri-Ck for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:31:09 +0000 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:31:05 +0100 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20190218083105.tl4j5jjp7l42rnpz@pengutronix.de> References: <20190207145801.6893-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> <20190211080020.5sjssmrhq26vl7tn@pengutronix.de> <8bb4a983-9b6b-bb50-d2b4-7244ad18e27f@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8bb4a983-9b6b-bb50-d2b4-7244ad18e27f@pengutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] LICENSES: adopt Linux-like LICENSES directory structure To: Ahmad Fatoum Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 09:56:10AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > On 11/2/19 09:00, Sascha Hauer wrote: > >> diff --git a/LICENSES/exceptions/u-boot-exception-2.0 b/LICENSES/exceptions/u-boot-exception-2.0 > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 000000000000..c9b3cd981f51 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/LICENSES/exceptions/u-boot-exception-2.0 > >> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ > >> + > >> +GPL License Exception: > >> + > >> +Even though U-Boot in general is covered by the GPL-2.0/GPL-2.0+, > >> +this does *not* cover the so-called "standalone" applications that > >> +use U-Boot services by means of the jump table provided by U-Boot > >> +exactly for this purpose - this is merely considered normal use of > >> +U-Boot, and does *not* fall under the heading of "derived work". > >> + > >> + The header files "include/image.h" and "arch/*/include/asm/u-boot.h" > >> +define interfaces to U-Boot. Including these (unmodified) header > >> +files in another file is considered normal use of U-Boot, and does > >> +*not* fall under the heading of "derived work". > > > > I don't think we need this. barebox doesn't have (and never had since > > the fork from U-Boot) these standalone applications. There is no > > jumptable in barebox. What we do have is modules support, but these are > > not covered by this text. > > I can send out a v2 without the exception. Everything else is ok? Yes, at least for me. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox