From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ARM: at91: replace at91sam9_ddrsdr.h with at91bootstrap's at91_ddrsdrc.h
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:22:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190403072230.jku5azrmwsp6jztk@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190402191837.GA5916@ravnborg.org>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:18:37PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ahmad.
>
> > >
> > > If we introduced the following small helpers we could simplify the call sites
> > > to just use at91_get_ddram_size(AT91SAM9G45_BASE_DDRSDRC0) and similar.
> > >
> > > static inline u32 at91_get_ddram_size(void __force __iomem * addr)
> > > {
> > > return __at91_get_ddram_size(IOMEM(addr), true);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline u32 at91sam9g45_get_ddram_size(void __force __iomem * addr)
> > > {
> > > return __at91_get_ddram_size(IOMEM(addr), false);
> > > }
> >
> > That would still require the pointer cast to pacify the -Wint-conversion.
> > And (void*)ADDR looks only marginally better IOMEM(ADDR) IMO
> > at the cost of having sparse miss passing memory pointers
> > (__force __iomem would be equivalent to just __attribute__((noderef)), wouldn't it?)
> >
> > My preference would've been that AT91SAM9G45_BASE_DDRSDRC0 already expands
> > to a void __iomem *.
> The main idea was to get rid of the bool argument and use more explicit function
> names.
+1 for explicit function names. It's easier for the caller to get it
right.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-03 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-01 10:18 [PATCH v3 00/15] ARM: at91: microchip-kz9477-evb: support first stage boot Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] LICENSES: add BSD-1-Clause license Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 12:20 ` Roland Hieber
2019-04-21 9:03 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] ARM: at91: import at91bootstrap's at91_ddrsdrc.h Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 12:32 ` Roland Hieber
2019-04-01 13:36 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 14:23 ` Roland Hieber
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] ARM: at91: migrate at91sam9_ddrsdr.h to use " Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] ARM: at91: replace at91sam9_ddrsdr.h with " Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-02 17:25 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-02 18:36 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-02 19:18 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-03 7:22 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2019-04-03 9:54 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] ARM: at91: watchdog: implement at91_wdt_disable Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-02 17:38 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-02 18:39 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-02 19:20 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] ARM: at91: import lowlevel clock initialization from at91bootstrap Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-02 17:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-02 18:44 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-02 19:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] ARM: at91: import early_udelay " Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] ARM: at91: import low level DDRAMC initialization code " Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-03 7:48 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] ARM: at91: import lowlevel dbgu UART init " Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] images: at91: differentiate between first and second stage images Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-02 17:49 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-21 9:21 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] ARM: at91: microchip-ksz9477-evb: use compressed DTB Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] ARM: dts: microchip-ksz9477-evb: add dummy first stage device tree Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] ARM: at91: microchip-ksz9477-evb: implement first stage Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-01 12:37 ` Roland Hieber
2019-04-01 13:37 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-03 7:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] ARM: at91: microchip-ksz9477: provide board code fallback Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-02 18:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-21 9:42 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-03 8:15 ` Sascha Hauer
2019-04-01 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] doc: microchip-ksz9477-evb: add documentation Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-02 18:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-02 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] ARM: at91: microchip-kz9477-evb: support first stage boot Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190403072230.jku5azrmwsp6jztk@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox