From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
lst@pengutronix.de, ore@pengutronix.de, rcz@pengutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: cache-armv7: start invalidation from outer levels
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 19:18:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190423171852.26126-4-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423171852.26126-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
The ARM Cortex-A Series Programmer's Guide notes[1]:
> Some care is required with cache maintenance activity in multi-core
> systems that include a L2C-310 L2 cache (or similar). Cleaning or
> invalidating the L1 cache and L2 cache will not be a single atomic
> operation. A core might therefore perform cache maintenance on
> a particular address in both L1 and L2 caches only as two discrete
> steps. If another core were to access the affected address between
> those two actions, a coherency problem can occur. Such problems can
> be avoided by following two simple rules.
>
> * When cleaning, always clean the innermost (L1) cache first and then
> clean the outer cache(s).
> * When invalidating, always invalidate the outermost cache first and
> the L1 cache last.
The current code correctly iterates from inner to outer cache levels
when flushing/cleaning (r8 == 0), invalidation (r8 == 1) occurs in the
same direction though. Adjust the invalidation iteration order to start
from the outermost cache instead.
Equivalent C-Code:
enum cache_op { CACHE_FLUSH = 0, CACHE_INVAL = 1 };
register enum cache_op operation asm("r8");
register int i asm("r12");
register int limit asm("r3") = max_cache_level << 1; // e.g. 4 with L2 max
+if (operation == CACHE_FLUSH) {
i = 0;
+} else {
+ i = limit - 2;
+}
bool loop_again;
do {
/* [snip] */
+ if (operation == CACHE_FLUSH) {
i += 2;
loop_again = limit > i;
+ } else {
+ loop_again = i > 0;
+ i -= 2;
+ }
} while (loop_again);
[1]: 18.6 "TLB and cache maintenance broadcast", Version 4.0
Suggested-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S b/arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S
index 0eb0ecfee756..b2d70bece7b9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/cache-armv7.S
@@ -83,7 +83,10 @@ hierarchical:
ands r3, r0, #0x7000000 @ extract loc from clidr
mov r3, r3, lsr #23 @ left align loc bit field
beq finished @ if loc is 0, then no need to clean
- mov r12, #0 @ start clean at cache level 0
+ cmp r8, #0
+THUMB( ite eq )
+ moveq r12, #0
+ subne r12, r3, #2 @ start invalidate at outmost cache level
loop1:
add r2, r12, r12, lsr #1 @ work out 3x current cache level
mov r1, r0, lsr r2 @ extract cache type bits from clidr
@@ -118,8 +121,15 @@ THUMB( ite eq )
subs r7, r7, #1 @ decrement the index
bge loop2
skip:
+ cmp r8, #0
+ bne inval_check
add r12, r12, #2 @ increment cache number
cmp r3, r12
+ b loop_end_check
+inval_check:
+ cmp r12, #0
+ sub r12, r12, #2 @ decrement cache number
+loop_end_check:
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ERRATA_814220
dsb
#endif
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-23 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-23 17:18 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: mmu: misc armv7 cache/MMU fixes Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: cache-armv7: add work-around for errata 814220 Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-25 10:38 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-25 10:02 ` Lucas Stach
2019-04-23 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: imx: work around i.MX6UL ERR008958 (ARM errata 814220) Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:41 ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-04-25 10:39 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:18 ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2019-04-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: cache-armv7: start invalidation from outer levels Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-25 9:57 ` Lucas Stach
2019-04-23 17:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: mmu: remove doubly defined macro Ahmad Fatoum
2019-04-23 17:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: mmu: mark uncached regions as eXecute never on v7 Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190423171852.26126-4-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lst@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ore@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rcz@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox