* [PATCH] pinctrl-single: Handle "pinctrl-single, function-mask" dt property
@ 2020-01-14 14:51 Clement Leger
2020-01-20 8:33 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Clement Leger @ 2020-01-14 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sascha Hauer, barebox; +Cc: Siméon Marijon, Simeon Marijon
From: Siméon Marijon <simeon.marijon@kalray.eu>
Implement linux behavior regarding "pinctrl-single,function-mask" and
"pinctrl-single,bits".
It allows multiple pins control per register.
(linux sha1: 4e7e8017a80e1810100c9b416b86e3baef900285)
Signed-off-by: Simeon Marijon <simeon@marijon.fr>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 3c581ed5d..d4f411b4a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -29,7 +29,13 @@ struct pinctrl_single {
struct pinctrl_device pinctrl;
unsigned (*read)(void __iomem *reg);
void (*write)(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg);
- unsigned width;
+ unsigned int width;
+ unsigned int fmask;
+ unsigned int fshift;
+ unsigned int fmax;
+
+ bool bits_per_mux;
+ unsigned int bits_per_pin;
};
static unsigned __maybe_unused pcs_readb(void __iomem *reg)
@@ -66,27 +72,47 @@ static int pcs_set_state(struct pinctrl_device *pdev, struct device_node *np)
{
struct pinctrl_single *pcs = container_of(pdev, struct pinctrl_single, pinctrl);
unsigned size = 0, index = 0;
+ unsigned int offset, val, rows, mask, reg, i;
const __be32 *mux;
dev_dbg(pcs->pinctrl.dev, "set state: %s\n", np->full_name);
-
- mux = of_get_property(np, "pinctrl-single,pins", &size);
-
- size /= sizeof(*mux); /* Number of elements in array */
-
- if (!mux || !size || (size & 1)) {
- dev_err(pcs->pinctrl.dev, "bad data for mux %s\n",
- np->full_name);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- while (index < size) {
- unsigned offset, val;
-
- offset = be32_to_cpup(mux + index++);
- val = be32_to_cpup(mux + index++);
-
- pcs->write(val, pcs->base + offset);
+ if (pcs->bits_per_mux) {
+ mux = of_get_property(np, "pinctrl-single,bits", &size);
+ if (size % 3 != 0)
+ dev_err(pcs->pinctrl.dev,
+ "invalid args_count for spec: %u\n", size);
+
+ size /= sizeof(*mux); /* Number of elements in array */
+ rows = size / 3;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
+ offset = be32_to_cpup(mux + index++);
+ mask = be32_to_cpup(mux + index++);
+ val = be32_to_cpup(mux + index++);
+ reg = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset);
+ reg &= ~mask;
+ reg |= val;
+ pcs->write(reg, pcs->base + offset);
+ }
+ } else {
+ mux = of_get_property(np, "pinctrl-single,pins", &size);
+
+ size /= sizeof(*mux); /* Number of elements in array */
+
+ if (!mux || !size || (size & 1)) {
+ dev_err(pcs->pinctrl.dev, "bad data for mux %s\n",
+ np->full_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ while (index < size) {
+ unsigned int offset, val;
+
+ offset = be32_to_cpup(mux + index++);
+ val = be32_to_cpup(mux + index++);
+
+ pcs->write(val, pcs->base + offset);
+ }
}
return 0;
@@ -137,6 +163,23 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct device_d *dev)
goto out;
}
+ ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "pinctrl-single,function-mask",
+ &pcs->fmask);
+ if (!ret) {
+ pcs->fshift = __ffs(pcs->fmask);
+ pcs->fmax = pcs->fmask >> pcs->fshift;
+ } else {
+ /* If mask property doesn't exist, function mux is invalid. */
+ pcs->fmask = 0;
+ pcs->fshift = 0;
+ pcs->fmax = 0;
+ }
+
+ pcs->bits_per_mux =
+ of_property_read_bool(np, "pinctrl-single,bit-per-mux");
+ if (pcs->bits_per_mux)
+ pcs->bits_per_pin = fls(pcs->fmask);
+
ret = pinctrl_register(&pcs->pinctrl);
if (ret)
goto out;
--
2.15.0.276.g89ea799
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pinctrl-single: Handle "pinctrl-single, function-mask" dt property
2020-01-14 14:51 [PATCH] pinctrl-single: Handle "pinctrl-single, function-mask" dt property Clement Leger
@ 2020-01-20 8:33 ` Sascha Hauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2020-01-20 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Clement Leger; +Cc: barebox, Siméon Marijon, Simeon Marijon
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 03:51:40PM +0100, Clement Leger wrote:
> From: Siméon Marijon <simeon.marijon@kalray.eu>
>
> Implement linux behavior regarding "pinctrl-single,function-mask" and
> "pinctrl-single,bits".
> It allows multiple pins control per register.
>
> (linux sha1: 4e7e8017a80e1810100c9b416b86e3baef900285)
>
> Signed-off-by: Simeon Marijon <simeon@marijon.fr>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-20 8:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-14 14:51 [PATCH] pinctrl-single: Handle "pinctrl-single, function-mask" dt property Clement Leger
2020-01-20 8:33 ` Sascha Hauer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox