From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jU1zv-0004qm-C9 for barebox@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 05:44:37 +0000 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:44:32 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer Message-ID: <20200430054432.GH5877@pengutronix.de> References: <20200429112914.5751-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <72aafb2f-d612-23b4-f1b3-d42c5b5ce503@phytec.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <72aafb2f-d612-23b4-f1b3-d42c5b5ce503@phytec.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "barebox" Errors-To: barebox-bounces+u.kleine-koenig=pengutronix.de@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Phytec phyCORE i.MX6: delete wrong memory node To: Stefan =?iso-8859-15?Q?Riedm=FCller?= Cc: Barebox List , Christian Hemp Hi Stefan, On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Stefan Riedm=FCller wrote: > Hi Sascha, > = > On 29.04.20 13:29, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > The phyCORE i.MX6 has two memory nodes in the device tree. /memory comes > = > Here and in the subject line you mention the phyCORE-i.MX 6 but it is > actually the phyFLEX which you change. Yes, I mistakenly thought they use the same base device tree. Changed to phyFLEX. > = > Besides that, > Reviewed-by: Stefan Riedmueller Thanks Sascha -- = Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox